From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59018-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A19D198002
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:39:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8179E055B;
Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB37E0330
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:39:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so10795610oag.17
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 04:39:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=rcq/yZbJmuc36nPUVQSBW1OyNVbd2GIQazyunPQfJzw=;
b=dG3XxdfJWogRTU0GOfjcsWlxGMgPSWYpDyxWN6JGKXDdtcurRWw5BNCoOac02QupYJ
S0pYEo+nKO7KvhDRmfGVGsMP1QOoXTVLcdZP/2ytyWIbHiNBcQPaHHySNTuvK6J9NKz6
vmuuyPq0O06lO/dwbHoD9l4XopxLx+rVGE5cONWqOtyT+izPfnTxg5OgNleZHsVRe/tZ
f+HKngGHth09m4KOT0znvc132bnU5Wb3/dginp0x8q1u4quREuZzpsP20OJ+K5VjBFRI
/63CVzuVITkYt1kJOSUgGYsLdLD/rgLqUF2xPnxR6msTbR2rx/4CdwoNpErg60DM3RW/
5Dzw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.11.35 with SMTP id n3mr18635013oeb.90.1362487158118; Tue,
05 Mar 2013 04:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.106.33 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 04:39:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <513448F2.4040004@flameeyes.eu>
References: <513448F2.4040004@flameeyes.eu>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:39:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+NrkpewoikyJM1kLx=DfHFZBxkJfw6ObqwrwWwRVTLoBJNHZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals
From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= <tomas.chvatal@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: c9f249ed-bfb2-4345-889d-a01df83900eb
X-Archives-Hash: 3ddc16794f4ad01a88d2633dfe318dee
2013/3/4 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>:
> virtual/c++-tr1-functional
> virtual/c++-tr1-memory
> virtual/c++-tr1-type-traits
>
> Given that these will have a (bad) GCC dependnecy and a boost dependency
> on them, should we just drop them?
>
Sounds like best solution, so i would go for it.
Cheers
Tom