* [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals
@ 2013-03-04 7:10 Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-03-05 12:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Diego Elio Pettenò @ 2013-03-04 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi all.
Since I'm running the tinderbox for Boost 1.52 on stable, and I was
looking into adding sub-slot support to my own packages, I noticed that
the three C++ TR1 virtuals are almost completely unused. The only user
is wvstreams, and only for one of them (functional).
I'm talking about:
virtual/c++-tr1-functional
virtual/c++-tr1-memory
virtual/c++-tr1-type-traits
Given that these will have a (bad) GCC dependnecy and a boost dependency
on them, should we just drop them?
Thanks,
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals
2013-03-04 7:10 [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals Diego Elio Pettenò
@ 2013-03-05 12:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tomáš Chvátal @ 2013-03-05 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
2013/3/4 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>:
> virtual/c++-tr1-functional
> virtual/c++-tr1-memory
> virtual/c++-tr1-type-traits
>
> Given that these will have a (bad) GCC dependnecy and a boost dependency
> on them, should we just drop them?
>
Sounds like best solution, so i would go for it.
Cheers
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-05 12:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-04 7:10 [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-03-05 12:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox