From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB347198005 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 325B5E068F; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E4DE04AB for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ta14so1411954obb.14 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:44:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bH2EmsOkW4acYOWPji4Ie4tgv7soa3H2Otte2XcTZMI=; b=a3eHchnSa3nLudHkI6qXY4GFppuaOZ7CMlZh2lXLF4RmQWIa/UcAyIdXvZ32qcfThC +tecF9kSAAu7eI+BhlMgIigneoESb/2+k8/lfHu2inb4YJGDXas7To4DGCRYIM/5xOC4 KeQIHa8q+mPuhNYirsDnD5bdqab5Lwm1VWipxTjJpG0htbuJm5E8CS8v/4dyfww8aFJJ wcyq1V2LLiidS+eU5HjSldMo6IJ/6Qajo+nbZGSEuDgmXwj2cvpzKEho/UdYIorufO/3 TwJePtvMZ/TXyAp5VKpsWYJ1bNFU+xMM9SJlUf9cdsyH3jREOuu+7uvsdCsIOTRJfwhY lvvw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.170.242 with SMTP id ap18mr12844545oec.108.1362311058428; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:44:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.106.33 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 03:44:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.106.33 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 03:44:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201303022144.36781.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20130301081602.D1F5D2171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201303022057.29177.vapier@gentoo.org> <201303022144.36781.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/confuse: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d3f84b61b3204d703c238 X-Archives-Salt: e359f05e-94de-4063-bb45-d627b929afbc X-Archives-Hash: 8ae82aa09fae461f91b92ac7ee21231b --bcaec54d3f84b61b3204d703c238 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure? Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mike Frysinger" napsal(a): > On Saturday 02 March 2013 21:01:39 Markos Chandras wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote: > > > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse > > > already installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference > > > here. > > > > Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? and > if > > it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keywords in > the > > first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange and > this > > is why I asked > > sounds like there's no further clarification necessary > -mike > --bcaec54d3f84b61b3204d703c238 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into test= ing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users could= 9;ve reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore the ru= les to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure?

Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mike Frysinger" <= ;vapier@gentoo.org> napsal(a):<= br type=3D"attribution">
On Saturday 02 March 2013 21:01:39 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confus= e
> > already installed go down in fire. =C2=A0it literally makes 0 dif= ference
> > here.
>
> Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? an= d if
> it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keyword= s in the
> first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange= and this
> is why I asked

sounds like there's no further clarification necessary
-mike
--bcaec54d3f84b61b3204d703c238--