From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C381392EF for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 313B4E0853; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C8F6E0843 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy4so5330618vcb.6 for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=M2GcNXtf2byP4hvxUD/gkWMdUcFWD6olHAm8G7LNKI8=; b=tGfcs3xI4/Q31B3qffEsgzVpdnj3ZR1BCkwUKwClvfknrkGNjl7RmHvG6gLqz55xvm N2Z8/evjL4Qrt6aQDzibIIiFQU9yhb1E72brHYPLRyTP1eNOTeypdlYoDcMll5IzvIRn QoskfOvZxYUcYarBtsIeuw9oYzrnJ68rCXsL0ASQ1ZG4eAry1sNyFFy+Xx+88FOe671L In9qWbDByxs2VCp+iyu7uVOY627kKOJLB7ZWouX7l6sLCg6D618xE+/ugQFKaU/iq4Nd omUjB5UEZlUDlfp2sEFHFqIScNGM6ygdi+n05K0zqlMRMJhrNEIk8V8XaFtwWwmsx3Oe 99Gg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.245.194 with SMTP id xq2mr33751695vec.26.1404823709488; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.54.73 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <21435.59173.595934.282271@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20140707234502.3009929a@pomiot.lan> <20140708133859.3bc01349@pomiot.lan> <21435.59173.595934.282271@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:48:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Michael Palimaka Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6b7bc2d1c0a04fdae0296 X-Archives-Salt: 6eac6840-bb06-480c-8ba8-00803aa3942a X-Archives-Hash: 668c87fbb6cccbb80c75b9fd73a8fcd8 --047d7bd6b7bc2d1c0a04fdae0296 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-07-08 14:42 GMT+02:00 Ulrich Mueller : > >>>>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > In fact, they did remove ebuilds from the tree in the past for this > > reason [1]. > > Given that this was a live ebuild that failed to compile [2] and was > dumped onto the games team few weeks after it was committed to the > tree [3], I can even understand their reaction, in this particular > case. > [2] Clear upstream bug, we remove live versions when from time to time upstream break their repo? If you take look on 1.0 it IS almost the same ebuild? [3] I remved myself from maitnainership as I found out I don't have enought time to work on stuff in Gentoo to keep myself only in office and to make them working... So if they didn't want the live version it is perfectly sane reasoning for pruning that before, but removing the 1.0 commited few weeks ago it is just utter stupid approach and reason why I avoid to have to touch anything with games team in Gentoo. Tom > > Ulrich > > > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D431552 > [3] > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/games-strategy/op= enxcom/metadata.xml?hideattic=3D0&r1=3D1.1&r2=3D1.2 > --047d7bd6b7bc2d1c0a04fdae0296 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2014= -07-08 14:42 GMT+02:00 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>:
>>>>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Micha=C5=82 G=C3= =B3rny wrote:

> In fact, they did remove ebuilds from the tree in the past for this > reason [1].

Given that this was a live ebuild that failed to compile [2] and was<= br> dumped onto the games team few weeks after it was committed to the
tree [3], I can even understand their reaction, in this particular
case.

[2] Clear upstream bug, we remove= live versions when from time to time upstream break their repo? If you tak= e look on 1.0 it IS almost the same ebuild?
[3] I remved myself from mai= tnainership as I found out I don't have enought time to work on stuff i= n Gentoo to keep myself only in office and to make them working... So if th= ey didn't want the live version it is perfectly sane reasoning for prun= ing that before, but removing the 1.0 commited few weeks ago it is just utt= er stupid approach and reason why I avoid to have to touch anything with ga= mes team in Gentoo.

Tom

Ulrich


[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D431552
[3] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/ga= mes-strategy/openxcom/metadata.xml?hideattic=3D0&r1=3D1.1&r2=3D1.2<= /a>

--047d7bd6b7bc2d1c0a04fdae0296--