From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57828-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569731385EA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42C3421C05C;
	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441A821C04D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so6806912obq.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:16:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=llnSFGYaSquzTOw5WgFO1btalGcxApr8trWJgzjVxB0=;
        b=Av7VT8e0A6BWoePKMiDq7JjbrbmClHh5w8rJzW003AbVm9XPGR4DQpIQANTNkbaio2
         aENqLnnFNk1LlBgWkmvmTrArbumbnoTgsJMUhlmqZPKOHW9tmZOLPuJFmwAdT7pDUrZI
         GbTnaGiBz8gzhqzz8spoeg6CKd8Ci8ekZyAuNBgzO+XH55aVWmXReN6t2P65EoXw2lwt
         01fs6CGFmhEywpRoe5pu1zLC6f1Iw38A8ByvGTVAF3ip1nwZJYXlNwLeJeuhuQDtfMTo
         FoaNNBBaeh3ISBd/NqcdS25GRApTW2gcDZX2Nu8qtZnRlfTLawN218CZXYrWTiHutTWS
         qpPw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.169.133 with SMTP id ae5mr15729966oec.74.1358838991347;
 Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.88.38 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:16:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1358802503.2064.49.camel@belkin4>
References: <1358802503.2064.49.camel@belkin4>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:16:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+NrkpdW=fMumdn80MVDoe8MU7=D8wDBBpApNtSA2O3HLWgOfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog
 function to force elog printing
From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= <tomas.chvatal@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 352cb177-95b9-4a63-a7d8-2e23304611fc
X-Archives-Hash: 28a046b6632358236b5ea594b3c45d11

2013/1/21 Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>:
> This can be useful when, for example, doc contents are modified. You can
> then rely on using REPLACING_VERSIONS in your ebuild to print messages
> when people updates from versions using old docs
>
> Patch to review attached
>

Would'nt be better to just set some variable in the ebuild, rather
than call function that touches empty file?

Tom