From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:41:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+Nrkpc7b8oMEOTMPx9bR_8e3WR9m3tjqfNSicBevsLs_C-M5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2jQ8i+EUmgGfM3M9z=D5Kik0j5YOppF3cW5sfcmKQHBypc1A@mail.gmail.com>
2013/1/17 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>:
> On 16 January 2013 20:09, Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
>> "Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)" <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> scarabeus 13/01/16 12:40:02
>>>
>>> Modified: ChangeLog
>>> Added: ffmpeg-9.ebuild
>>> Removed: ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> Add new virtual for 1.1/9 series. Masked. Also it has switched dep
>>> order as will be announced upon unmasking.
>>
>> ... and since we are committing silently without any real discussion I
>> will switch the dep order again and announce it much later without
>> leaving room for discussion :)
>>
>> More seriously: Why ? Who decided this ?
>
> I agree. This is a big change so there should be a discussion about
> this or at least an announcement that this is going to happen on the
> Xth of February. Did you actually test that the tree is ready for
> libav as the default ffmpeg provider?
>
Yep I did test it. On stable there is nothing broken and right now
even mplayer1 compiles fine.
On testing there should be nothing broken apart from xbmc, where
Alexis is one of upstream devs and he seems not to give fuck about
making it work under both.
Also Samuli broke it yesterday because he seems not to be bothered
about fixing reverse dependencies with cdio update (but again it seems
simple to test and fix which will be done when I am not working and
have time to test it properly).
So yes it works and should not pose any issues to user. I also
announced it over blog to get people report more issues they find out
so I can be really sure it works out. It turned out the mplayer1
really needs to work under both, which I patched yesterday for stable
libav and Luca today for masked libav to work.
So overall we are in green numbers if few people didn't break it on
purpose or just for the ignorance.
The only weird stuff might be for migrating users that they have to
use "emerge -C ffmpeg && emerge -1v libav libpostproc" as a postproc
is not yet split out of ffmpeg. But even that could be discussed and
we can switch to split libpostproc under both libs to have matching
deps (even ffmpeg has --disable-postrpoc switch :)).
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130116124002.B9FA22171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
2013-01-16 20:09 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild Alexis Ballier
2013-01-16 20:39 ` Luca Barbato
2013-01-16 21:31 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-16 21:52 ` Luca Barbato
2013-01-16 22:37 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-16 20:55 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-02-07 5:52 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-08 21:41 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2013-02-08 21:46 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-09 14:12 ` Luca Barbato
2013-02-09 14:48 ` Rich Freeman
2013-02-11 2:01 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-11 11:25 ` Discussing defaults (Was: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild) Luca Barbato
2013-02-11 13:49 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-11 16:22 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-11 18:39 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-11 20:41 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-11 21:04 ` Luca Barbato
2013-02-11 21:33 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-11 23:19 ` Luca Barbato
2013-02-11 23:34 ` Peter Stuge
2013-02-12 7:21 ` Ian Whyman
2013-02-12 11:16 ` Luca Barbato
2013-02-12 14:19 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-12 11:59 ` Rich Freeman
2013-02-11 21:39 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-17 5:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild Samuli Suominen
2013-01-17 12:22 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-17 13:19 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-17 13:26 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-17 14:00 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-17 14:10 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-17 14:41 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-18 0:32 ` Duncan
2013-01-18 1:04 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-18 6:12 ` Duncan
2013-01-18 12:09 ` [gentoo-dev] On tinderboxing Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-17 14:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild Peter Stuge
2013-01-17 9:19 ` Markos Chandras
2013-01-17 9:41 ` Tomáš Chvátal [this message]
2013-01-17 10:45 ` Markos Chandras
2013-01-17 11:02 ` Ben de Groot
2013-01-17 11:23 ` Alexander Berntsen
2013-01-17 11:32 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-01-17 13:05 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-17 14:07 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-01-17 14:39 ` Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+Nrkpc7b8oMEOTMPx9bR_8e3WR9m3tjqfNSicBevsLs_C-M5w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomas.chvatal@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox