From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:22:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CSuALpkmxifRWN8cRxPwbU5w_1SjmFJBgJg3egyDzwNX-gPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140120020137.111b36bf@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It is more of a "Do we want QA to delegate this through ComRel or not?".
Actually, no. What it is is a "Subject was thoroughly discussed in the
past, and a decision was made." More than once, in fact. What basis do
you have that would warrant more bilkeshedding on this subject?
It may sound crazy, but it isn't entirely impossible that decisions
made in the past were not made lightly. It's also not entirely
impossible that one of the reasons such decisions are made is so that
people can stop rehashing the same topics over and over again and
focus on more useful and fun topics.
Denis.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-19 5:02 [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights William Hubbs
2014-01-19 5:07 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-19 5:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " W. Trevor King
2014-01-19 12:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2014-01-20 1:05 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-19 20:22 ` Denis Dupeyron
2014-01-20 1:01 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 1:22 ` Denis Dupeyron [this message]
2014-01-20 2:47 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 16:30 ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-01-20 1:24 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-20 2:54 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 13:59 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-20 14:09 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-21 0:22 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-21 0:46 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 5:29 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-21 5:27 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 17:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-01-22 22:37 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-01-22 22:59 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 14:56 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 15:47 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:26 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-21 17:50 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:56 ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 18:11 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 18:16 ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 19:18 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 21:03 ` Thomas Sachau
2014-01-21 22:56 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:14 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-22 7:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 10:36 ` hasufell
2014-01-22 10:39 ` hasufell
2014-01-22 10:58 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 23:29 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 12:34 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-22 19:42 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-22 23:40 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 22:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 23:15 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:20 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+CSuALpkmxifRWN8cRxPwbU5w_1SjmFJBgJg3egyDzwNX-gPw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=calchan@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox