From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59738-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC661381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69DFFE0A6B;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:12:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F8DE09FD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so1097712bkc.30
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=ISd/Sqi3I8/AKTCMHot4Zp5dXR2Ry4YL+coMJn88pGE=;
        b=soj5fqN3AMUn9vrTUQwv3D7RppMlyJf4Dhxo1nkbJYWHrWPkAIyLQVSMUmt5OZU9BJ
         RfHyL5tKDIApBbIktEvbOuYbAd9p8zkRWjbC/24kWx0eQZki2HL2H8UsFQcP5g0afpvV
         F5eC2Q23iLg/tlDzPKOwAB/52kqCYuXdGhLoCJU1lwvMF0g8tKXafv74KAhN4kYT4P1l
         uTtkO5NCYoMgIp1wHxJmZ32JfUBZZyazyqCjtMNlt4Z/SlOhu1UGcWzqhnoVfiSVsn76
         qpEDzo1q/opOUcws8p8Mx/rLok3XBz5TTmuXA4khzSzLduVbRa+/10xxSSOF7OyLV4y5
         8jvw==
X-Received: by 10.204.60.10 with SMTP id n10mr8877741bkh.106.1366553518796;
 Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.169.198 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
 <20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:11:18 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mO5g8PLeylc_Ocun4sTMlscIEbA
Message-ID: <CA+CSuALVGJ9pRF1NMvJZ=W9G07tF8FtauoCXhNtQe-0CqxZGRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles:
 ChangeLog package.mask
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 0f21b2c1-67ff-49cc-8ae2-696172fae4a7
X-Archives-Hash: 70fa797d860be0d53795b8397775e3bb

I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not
propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being
actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch
it without talking to that person or team first. This is probably the
single most important rule in Gentoo and I would like to thank Ben for
reminding us of it. But nobody owns anything in Gentoo. As a developer
you're not king of the hill but servant of the users. The only way to
make yourself more relevant is by doing a better job, not by barking
at the others to protect your territory. By the way folks, a better
job also involves communication and behaviour which is what we all
generally suck at.

Denis.