From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59742-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135691381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:50:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26FF2E0B96;
Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com (mail-bk0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2051CE0B8E
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:50:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id je9so2304101bkc.19
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mQ8V7VqY4PtwOFC9XA1E6U4mP9kzTu9PL1jSN2hRzqg=;
b=EDAFXRi0JrMJw+USLNKcgD/u6bIxRKeSyPPh648uU/YkpBCUby6+YSU+EtnmZdau5f
GAAvuvyI9+cBdCu6VtAhL30V0/7fMB8f3rQ0rpSo2PBApcD8hv3bP8opPfmhj92V4xdr
pWZtE5MtE4b9PwHv6e4HN1g7++Qo9D73o5NdsX3bsh2N9KofzUqEXh1WdvJ5AOYiyihQ
Af7y8KL4KrBf+tZ/Ul5tw7tzTSp+dNy7ELK3ndQ4OGwOq/+aMzJ7pEXfmgjj5M1kCghz
ml7DqJCZCTknxwFSLgpyg66/H2MVTERJIRh/CxdAaT7piTcxgciQP8Wdmal+jWw8E774
/f5Q==
X-Received: by 10.204.167.73 with SMTP id p9mr8987304bky.99.1366555845477;
Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.169.198 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 07:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5173F9F7.6050100@gentoo.org>
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
<20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+CSuALVGJ9pRF1NMvJZ=W9G07tF8FtauoCXhNtQe-0CqxZGRQ@mail.gmail.com> <5173F9F7.6050100@gentoo.org>
From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:50:04 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UcHIr-5u8qHHzB36lWqXgeOjn9c
Message-ID: <CA+CSuAJcfk76eDtz2q8-PgRLSo2rfgLKXffK+JrztHtMKxc_rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles:
ChangeLog package.mask
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 17a0a161-accf-4e4d-b008-f8d7a55bc4b1
X-Archives-Hash: ed258e1ad8cb4e9cbf109b20d4b7f594
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n
<chithanh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> When someone asks about changing a package which someone else maintains, =
I
> always suggest reporting a bug about it. Do you think that is generally o=
k,
> or not the proper way to communicate?
Exactly. Bugzilla is not a communication tool, it's a process
management tool. The process in question is dealing with bugs. Don't
substitute filing a bug for communication. The main reason people end
up having these abrasive behaviours is they don't communicate
properly. If they did they'd find out they are actually very much
alike and agree on most things. Communication is (in order of
effectivity) in-person meeting, phone, irc, email. If you're not using
any of these tools you're not communicating effectively and you can't
expect things to go smoothly.
Denis.