From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66618-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB36F13877A for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D617E094A; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B6AE092D for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so655992qga.22 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=9+Ob1Z6S1JwFtGWiBEa1ycNv6cd3QKZvF+1JLYm+Ozc=; b=iEV7hqtlFi9VTBUF1WS9URlmRROcA8Zl5YUvDeO3Qjal3UFKfW8iAS5qoauRNqfgdX llpKhnThW0ERJI7HZzrLmHHPlrII2cbwLR2CC2pddM6Nco11Dg3YdO865a65mjbObwhN pbei3Hy2rFNiU4cfWpp/4ELcpDwNhx5ZuMrPtQvkunCq13TM3XA9vHgIuAb859hDxQhS BwP9PX3J72oqcDp8J4LNp63ZnZ4158SwoNS9avLcdCyTfWXsJgu+gzhaJR1l7SP9F8YU AKszVcbOxfgpGCMtizQsaWNc73pTRyQA10sx0BZTnBqPJksp12iXjgvZ6MNVBobVMoOU E2pg== X-Received: by 10.140.34.201 with SMTP id l67mr44539093qgl.61.1405519737726; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.27.39 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:08:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53BC12E2.6030002@gentoo.org> References: <53BB07C1.8090801@gentoo.org> <53BC12E2.6030002@gentoo.org> From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:08:17 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: osCef0z3xeMroHEaRVdxHPiaMm4 Message-ID: <CA+CSuA+LJqgs1vGmq9dXbOORjttXPnS9j6tdhY1cExLBP09p0A@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] last rites: games-fps/postal2mp-demo To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 9cb25433-aa8c-4dc9-9371-ae640cf74963 X-Archives-Hash: 416493f91cbdacb3dc7020e28f087a6a On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote: > Last rites cancelled; found a version bump'ed distfile via icculus, so > this one can live a little longer. I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at the time was that if upstream disappears there's a good chance, depending on why that happens, we can qualify the software as abandonware and the no mirror restriction may become moot. At that point we could push the distfiles to our mirrors. Note that this particular software still requires original installation media (on top of the 1GB+ distfiles) and a minimum of 1 but up to 3 valid license keys to install and then run. My point here is we could do this preemptively and more or less systematically in order to avoid being in the situation above. This could even be easily automated. The worst that can happen is we archive a few distfiles for nothing, which isn't a big price to pay. Denis.