RE: [gentoo-dev] Why no updates on delay of 2008.0 release

[Sylvain Alain <d2_racing@hotmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]


Yeah, they should at least post on note on the gentoo.org to announce the delay.SalutalpSylvain> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:27:59 +0100> From: yngwin@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Why no updates on delay of 2008.0 release> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----> Hash: SHA1> > I thought we had learnt something about not communicating with our userbase, but> it looks like this lesson has already been forgotten. While I appreciate there> probably are valid reasons for the delay of the beta and the release of 2008.0,> I don't think there is any excuse not to update the published release schedule,> nor for the utter lack of communication about this issue with our users. A short> message on the frontpage of www.gentoo.org with a new (even if tentative) ETA,> and some kind of explanation for the delay would certainly be much appreciated.> > Thanks,> > Ben> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org> > iD8DBQFH5N8vi+u7I1rvkiYRAqGBAJ49SeDwGgvVpTdMCI8M1DZ5hncuBwCZAWXd> GsgP7gY2xuOARHmCcbbx6xU=> =W6u7> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----> -- > gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list> 
_________________________________________________________________
This Valentine's Day, get creative and show your sweetheart how much you care with flair! Find fun date ideas here!
http://g.msn.ca/ca55/224

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1834 bytes --]