From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45467-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QExF1-0000vx-6C
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:24:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E2B1C041;
	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:24:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFF61C022
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:24:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1334960wyi.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=i27LpP5N4MWdvwka0rEdj0L6cdgR2L1Wk4rYCwdKNvg=;
        b=hsc587yMhTBR1UBi7Hfz37usdqgSbiXtgAc9gYJp/DeaSVjqWEJzZhtXlYwfCi6GMT
         Z1fZtKVz/4qRTgYMiv9eW4fdxYo3HmUYkY/NP1BkR1Ua8jjMhfjIVaRF6z9HZ/IhDLkT
         883vOLZUv6P4a1sLRplMjfaONoLBTFWOZ7mHA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=ARXOoh/J1RHWkyEyF1sljB656m+NyAetz64HFUtn0bNpiQ/gy1G2pkGbduyJ4ncwst
         9K9qnZO3DdrJY9Ms+jYmJ4jVb1gVpc9T4TEq4o3AqzXYPvf7TF24d0gOtTj8TA/zI/zh
         UqOxZ3DJYZBS+dO2I1EUIFEy/aprf0kM/Nz4w=
Received: by 10.216.192.34 with SMTP id h34mr5330730wen.112.1303881841121;
 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.187.85 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimTLJmr=YC7=34AeSAKx3UaCB02Tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DB71546.7060209@gentoo.org> <20110426195839.GA18255@lust> <BANLkTimTLJmr=YC7=34AeSAKx3UaCB02Tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:53:41 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1QKQv-KJRhjbMYU9jSPe7eFklrA
Message-ID: <BANLkTinUHoHFmu-wbE=1-H3K6ws+Q8Lp7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable
 news item
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: c0525e9f476e213da34b3c8135b86c18

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Can you link to the bug in the news item?
>

Hmmm, not sure how relevant the polkit vulnerability is to the news
item. It's supposed to be about setting mimetype handler information;
not to explain the reason why glib is going stable.


-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team