From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-46056-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QUfRG-00029A-Bc
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:38:22 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 689E91C0D2;
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68FA1C021
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:37:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4469460wwi.4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 06:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=Hl6l5bv5/GJpRE+LuIQ1r0eaDe/hxygy7ko0HjSZn/o=;
b=objmKJUghvJXsRgsRb+33Vdp7Mqv7SYblrOz9JsNPdWWdnwIH2mmgnZ3Kun8jtEvM9
eqLYy2MkluMn+tcWfVw1IQD6RxRSIZMPUuM/G3EBzPca/WeAu99Y4IKZ4A0DgzlXcGN2
BX9fwfzarY3asfDa5oICUB+NSAJGBHHOGl5bU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=Mo/FousHRKhxqRV04WKOH23yAepIhJSKJGnY/peMxOdWek4ZcqqI0PTHWNEP462m9l
cqPQyIH7JqxKokRRdb4gCNhSnYEsHNmlZ4RQiZWGTDH7MYdIVlzeuTPUCsHgYrbVWxA+
nSPsFQuvCKamBa1wrBRhf6cFKN1D3ye88JzSs=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.206.82 with SMTP id ft18mr808585wbb.64.1307626664706; Thu,
09 Jun 2011 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.227.129.130 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.129.130 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DF0C8B4.5090704@gentoo.org>
References: <20110609131022.6DE9420036@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
<4DF0C8B4.5090704@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:37:44 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KMapBccO0Mwo9fYA-CXf1PP4ZX4
Message-ID: <BANLkTin1gSWqQRpBVV11R1QPzrY-MF1M0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in
xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517448686d942f304a5478e39
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 4dcd0b78f4b2ceacf248bdcd9c5e11da
--001517448686d942f304a5478e39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Jun 9, 2011 9:27 AM, "Samuli Suominen" <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Autocrazy in effect; disagree with the lead and get removed from the team.
So, without trying to comment on the particulars of this situation (of which
I'm blissfully unaware beyond being able to guess from recent list traffic),
do we need some kind of policy around membership on "special" project teams.
QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might be another.
Options might include council appointment or council appoints lead who
appoints others. Direct election is another route, but I don't like the idea
of having 5 annual elections and recalls and all that. Better to elect the
top and let them reign in those beneath...
I'm not saying that anybody is doing a bad job now, but if people have
gripes better to have a proper route of escalation than just bickering
on-list. If they get to the top and aren't happy then they can just stew or
run for election next term...
Rich
--001517448686d942f304a5478e39
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>On Jun 9, 2011 9:27 AM, "Samuli Suominen" <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:ssuominen@gentoo.org">ssuominen@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Autocrazy in effect; disagree with the lead and get removed from the t=
eam.</p>
<p>So, without trying to comment on the particulars of this situation (of w=
hich I'm blissfully unaware beyond being able to guess from recent list=
traffic), do we need some kind of policy around membership on "specia=
l" project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra m=
ight be another. </p>
<p>Options might include council appointment or council appoints lead who a=
ppoints others. Direct election is another route, but I don't like the =
idea of having 5 annual elections and recalls and all that. Better to elect=
the top and let them reign in those beneath...</p>
<p>I'm not saying that anybody is doing a bad job now, but if people ha=
ve gripes better to have a proper route of escalation than just bickering o=
n-list. If they get to the top and aren't happy then they can just stew=
or run for election next term...</p>
<p>Rich</p>
--001517448686d942f304a5478e39--