From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QMPN3-0006sS-EN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:51:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68BA51C117; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB91A1C076 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so681077vxb.40 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wwYGpVHHn6/veVhduR0B7EcXMzr072d8ypDNI5YuzR8=; b=toEe/xSCGDmcfawodY09ksRq/0hPLr77UCGd7pzocuXj2PMIT6KQ6reHtq325+I2eI h8FhxytO4SmRV0CI9jD94rRLuE8W+BSRhJ9JpYWheQziLSnzs+XTsD2PewOlOS+6y2h0 XQCHW9W6pF+LrdFHgLhfqr84T0Ghfuwh+9DNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hXUz/QjbyYdbGBaR//R6MZobkt4IK3hNKQfCAyW4pB330ymj3dTPmHb3E2VYFYo4uB Gl5ekknd7rGbVkhcinRgPNz+oT4lhMu9uKsZTourYAz2+3mY/Nx3oUMOtTqg4BN1O3RC 7ghQmNPN69i8/ngV5BrNtZllirga4HB7Fw1Jo= Received: by 10.52.94.173 with SMTP id dd13mr1345959vdb.15.1305658277124; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.90.131 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:50:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105172043.15489.miknix@gentoo.org> References: <20110517165748.GA3266@linux1> <1305655899.18096.4.camel@tablet> <201105172043.15489.miknix@gentoo.org> From: Nirbheek Chauhan Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 00:20:57 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z6LDKY6bH99wye1wBB3sw6aozbg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 71be1ff541d7902ce21ad40d894ae4d0 On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:13 AM, =C3=82ngelo Arrifano = wrote: > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:28:56 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> I'd add that if we want /run to be on tmpfs, /var/run and /tmp should >> both be on tmpfs by default. I've been doing this manually for a year, >> and so have other distributions. > > The lwn article is definitely interesting to read, I welcome the new /run= . I > wouldn't make /tmp as tmpfs though, there are some packages (wireshask I'= m > looking at you) that can fill the directory fairly easy. > I wonder what Fedora and Ubuntnu do to fix that. Maybe we should do the same thing. --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team