From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QG24V-0007iJ-PQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:46:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 084951C015; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF82B1C00C for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36D331B400C for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so2276800qyg.19 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.90.130 with SMTP id i2mr4375825qcm.127.1304138745264; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.18.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:45:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DBB9298.10507@gentoo.org> References: <20110429181331.3C12720054@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20110429182617.GB21124@halcy0n.com> <4DBB04B7.1070107@gentoo.org> <4DBB8B9F.8010007@gentoo.org> <4DBB9298.10507@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:45:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-p2p/transmission: transmission-2.12.ebuild To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 79391d1fb8fd92127816155181f90377 On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wr= ote: > sources.gentoo.org is for that. =A0 ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is > not useful information to them So it follows that users don't need to see when ebuilds were removed?