From: Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Remove USE=fortran in default profile
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:35:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikfFG+OBfnzZxGOW86adGpBQ4T0cA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E01A157.8050806@gentoo.org>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:01 AM, justin <jlec@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 22/06/11 09:55, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:15:35 +0200
>> justin <jlec@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin <jlec@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>> with the addition of the fortran-2.eclass, it is possible to
>>>>> remove the USE=fortran from the default profiles. Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> justin
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I actually suggested this back in December, and no one
>>>> bothered to respond.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me,
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Removing fortran and adding an dependency on virtual/fortran lets
>>> portage select dev-lang/ifc as the fortran compiler of choice.
>>
>> That's because portage doesn't suggest USE changes for one-of deps, and
>> just falls back to first USE-clean option.
>>
>
> In my tests it does. if there only gcc[-fortra] present, it asks me to
> change the USE.
>
>>> I reverted it back temporarily, so everything should be fine now
>>> again.
>>
>> As said on IRC, if you really intend to do a thing like that, you
>> should re-enable fortfran on the gcc package by default.
>>
>
> I reverted to where we came from. Every further proceeding will be
> coordinated with the toolchain guys. Generally I would like to remove
> USE=fortran from default, as nearly solely science packages are written
> in fortran and I doubt that nearly half of the user base do science.
>
> I will come up with a plan.
>
> jusitn
>
>
Hey Justin,
One thing to note is that a few various python modules, like numpy,
really benefit from fortran. While many people using numpy are
scientists, many are not and further there are various modules that
depend on numpy that non-science folks use. I, for one, care little
about where that flag is set, since I have manually set that USE for
years now in make.conf. I am simply hoping to make you aware of the
fact that there are potential cases that could be easily overlooked.
Thanks!
Matt
--
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 7:17 [gentoo-dev] RFC Remove USE=fortran in default profile justin
2011-06-21 14:18 ` Matt Turner
2011-06-22 7:15 ` justin
2011-06-22 7:55 ` Michał Górny
2011-06-22 8:01 ` justin
2011-06-22 14:35 ` Matthew Summers [this message]
2011-06-22 14:47 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-06-22 15:16 ` justin
2011-06-22 19:17 ` James Cloos
2011-06-22 20:18 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikfFG+OBfnzZxGOW86adGpBQ4T0cA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=quantumsummers@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox