From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45186-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Q6RAO-0004jv-3K
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:32:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9205E1C02D;
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EAD1C01D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6337406iwn.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=0HdZYA8Kh/eM9p7H4RQ/Z44hkpmQcfH2OSejVqUURPU=;
b=awKVkJNyp/GAzzKA3XLVu52rG0dT6ZU59WjELSNs5RvWYc/vzQt9G8A/yIWe+wwsh7
1/pEuGDUjYxOuBbYoYZlZxnP4m2SGeCDTpTSUlWwuxra1RqCJijA+3l7FMP9IullmKS9
0uuWXwRGWVpXGVBH9SGny9TNsN16n62YzysI8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
b=sLoCPRfmELJ+xKH4sbZodTxCeq6BCnjhbpInL4D9ykZj0nndji+JV6hssRyJkr5yN3
VYVKDJJm8QiTGKjac0tkeBhVgjRKa//T9RQLuv2xhrn++1rDneLmUlWTv1HSCquy/BPo
1mrWv3OpAXOZNmE5ZDklbOHvs6QMpwCOZhfIc=
Received: by 10.231.140.81 with SMTP id h17mr6339222ibu.47.1301851894169; Sun,
03 Apr 2011 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201104031656.18057.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
References: <20110402221112.2101b4c1@gentoo.org> <201104031656.18057.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:31:14 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qoFtxDdihxV4PH9RnNB8jvfm4zs
Message-ID: <BANLkTikLRYd_MskSeUxkSP1ZqX2y9DQbKA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 982387014073903f95641aa9a281a594
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> On Sunday 03 April 2011 06:11:12 Ryan Hill wrote:
>> For general testing you may want to add the gcc-porting overlay to avoid
>> known failures that haven't been fixed in the tree yet.
>
> Just for clarification... I thought the toolchain overlay was for the always-
> gentoo-most-experimental compilers. What's the difference?!
one is for toolchains and one is for porting. the former only has
toolchain related packages while the latter has a lot of random
patched packages.
-mike