From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QJTHy-0003jE-5Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 16:26:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7F3B1C074; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1441C03C for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 363011B4045 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so4083410qyg.19 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.73.35 with SMTP id o35mr5316450qcj.13.1304958338143; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.18.3 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 09:25:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110308122813.BD46320054@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201103090908.33359.aballier@gentoo.org> <4D777D0E.5090107@gentoo.org> <201103091053.24930.aballier@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 12:25:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild To: aballier@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Tom=E1=B9_Chv=E1tal?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c2ab61e61d33f619d242fe3d9acc64e7 2011/4/29 Matt Turner : > 2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier : >> As for the reasons: "its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with, heh, >> some fixes and improvements I'm using..." > > So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop version with a few > patches on top? So, the freedesktop version is actually... upstream? > > We patch plenty of things in Gentoo. Why are we depending on SDS to do > that for us? > > Matt So...? Why are we shipping this version when it seems to be just the upstream version + patches? People on the X11 team already have commit access to freedesktop, and by extension, libva, so if the patches are reasonable we could just commit them ourselves. Why are we bothering with this SDS version? You weren't kidding about not being on IRC. !seen aballier says 7 months ago. Matt