From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU87P-0006wk-Jp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:03:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC451C065; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 02:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAEB1C015 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 02:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so36558wyi.40 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:02:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R6qffBkaa+0nBoOtrFApT8Lufz1t7L6mWaMlwaOjnm4=; b=VlzCFowlVjkGvL+S1aqkyEBKV8AQ2QmYuARfrkp/Lri8vdfYGlyUAcw45E62u48JCF X+aSj3iH2UXo+PSZN4LyEa9olFTzot3tqdYrRuHyHCsVxYzzb2/1gxj9+lwG/6wNHSjm Rlh7QXk9buyFmkQHgjJPpxNFrWJRNbIaYf71w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bRV0taq8dBvbobf3T8LHe00oi0e9JwbexOeW5y1jHnkrWc/SiGAchtGEjf4m4NyvoW UaplrGEdRthkVb0jc6q5zPVuHFhl9TtPbdaAYPE5fFqpzjIX7I8h9mNyWqtPXB15j3wS ShQove9YxcuLCwGorixX7diYk92enFSsQREuY= Received: by 10.217.4.66 with SMTP id t44mr4386315wes.104.1307498563120; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.1.67 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:02:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201106071811.21358.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4DBC36BF.8050208@kraav.com> <201106071811.21358.vapier@gentoo.org> From: Nirbheek Chauhan Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:32:23 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZI43kgbzvTRDSxRxVPn1s-RCwLM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 30e7124cf7c91fa4cb39c7cffa345be7 On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:20:15 Leho Kraav wrote: >> /etc/profile.d/dbus-session.sh attached, looking for feedback about >> problems with it and if the whole approach even makes sense. I might be >> not knowing something important. > > i dont think this makes sense in baselayout. =C2=A0it works great without= dbus. > > doesnt the login manager already take care of launching a dbus-session ? > I believe the use-case is being able to control applications from the VTs without having to launch a dbus session manually. Which should be done via ~/.bashrc, to be honest. Makes no sense to have a global dbus session, since it's supposed to be per-user. --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team