From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44935-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q2uFw-0000kD-9m
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:47:56 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E7881C11F;
	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:47:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651B81C0D6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:47:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so575591iwn.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=wM4iT6nRzfFoS3Lv5KrV62mOAU5HW9qWlCH6Da1dBYM=;
        b=xinImrgDShb9NO33zuOoKN2ozNXEFkHoKRo37sVkz7gZP311BPpDdAt3CNWbvshbp2
         3zekCPHLheIMwLQi9Y31D3vMwYlyt4SLeS5oThKpA3cXIWgGVrIyUgywEqSxq9gewT0E
         hpLum8VLdm6HkE31Bw2hoxhefhooSdaxAnypU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=IFvROOKhAGfGctLrIpgLnI75kGZkKz6Waef4sJseqr5k2D3DH3MowG4efUiND48EqV
         qs3HW5KwMJOIlfJ/LeEVc3T/eCGuVjdkbv5uQwyWkYIXCKG3GHSAMi/4vU7loU6ZIgyt
         FmQGXyI5jzvNk1vJ/078W9QAXS1huZ5bbLmcE=
Received: by 10.42.133.72 with SMTP id g8mr181218ict.80.1301010437868; Thu, 24
 Mar 2011 16:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJAuw1n8U3KyxFSVEwKfpkkWmrvgYgFM-bpB=h@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimJAuw1n8U3KyxFSVEwKfpkkWmrvgYgFM-bpB=h@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:46:56 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2YK-kcar00dVoQkZF-QUOIxCViE
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyRS8Np60SZQVsnAqVcw7L3qhJAO8EYF2nNAc6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 01cd9e09610b68f944ab629a1f3db37e

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Is there some plan to make verification of signed Manifests easy/automatic for end users?

the end goal is for it to be transparent when it works.  emerge itself
would check things as part of its digest verification.

as to the current state of emerge's support, i dont know.  be nice if
Zac showed up to SCALE so we could sign keys :p.
-mike