From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41307-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OP3Ai-0001XF-5U
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14D89E091A;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9592E07F4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so3678578iwn.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=nq65ajCsUINLj21RlkJ991M0rqCoR2+dgZhBUV6PfoY=;
        b=vv/r4PH8SNycrpkU9HOX8/mE8VAPmy6wFbhy+VZvWyo9aBYmGfF9Q/trnv7RijYSqM
         6MC4N8v0+p/QmOpskfRrqtqK1oEig0Ps7GSLDCf0TONrpvPOzJgmxDwsV100FhJxiHFQ
         8vf51uvS5MbVTP+KYq3sBarWz3vHxndToDCs8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=l66wde4r3Dd+MbqEM37BKDx5HeQEZlR8qssjLcHxphF6Npk7vzOdCZoRt5R0LHmzk2
         e0Hf47X/9a5Gg+To7DWtuoiGgMj4myqDuPe27Kag4n7ULRfhwnuco5ZVlFVBoRw/2Fe5
         CwJ+PM0WIMYm81yqaVJPOCKoViaiq5Mu971tk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.169.74 with SMTP id x10mr9743236iby.121.1276735281443; 
	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.212.223 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org>
References: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:41:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pQomJvifent7KTTyvVf7oJXzhWQ
Message-ID: <AANLkTinoLP9VF8QGkkQtNHfZ6VZB7b__Sx3jnz0rAbb0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposing fundamental changes to DevRel
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Developer Relations <devrel@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 785c2785-f24a-49ed-a28b-dcc191656e3d
X-Archives-Hash: fd2cbd4caaa26134ad794931548adddc

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> =A04) Disallow membership with both the conflict resolution group
> =A0 =A0and the council at the same time (as the council is where issues
> =A0 =A0with devrel are taken to).

i have yet to see this being necessary.  the one or two times there
was a conflict of interest, there was a minor discussion ahead of time
and cleanly resolved.

i.e. it isnt a problem
-mike