From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3Bsh-0000yB-A5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:37:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26BDA1C0F8; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9831C0F2 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so1724019iyb.40 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:36:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sNoRC9j1K4QJiAnl/PReUuLmFQseGGIXdYmqTgcDyF0=; b=u7aViGCg4pSz/8DrBQOj6GPvA0BMgLrYfx0tKp0cGEROHosAQ+VAkWLCeAzN0T/cYG 1ypY574DQynFM/dZ5Sz+fabZSD1+KknMa5iZGkJZofZm2MOXfaNJ3KfXS/VIiTimDhaP 8tq5I2SJNo43GFsqKyDQESnWICtw7LRpfv01k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nAxBxqhddcD19i/95/FLLooTcMcGaveqU9UjSn6Pu52h3kJ0o99Dx/QdlYm3F+SiDM svjWylYoKLMJ6EI2N4FMtX1nhFJ5YwGLE1o3CM4phdle5lq6SNKrRRp+gKAr2OzLXdrB sjOOgEq1sFUBinSv977uFBWiX56izvxwPQw3c= Received: by 10.231.130.22 with SMTP id q22mr1062973ibs.97.1301078194190; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:36:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110325005026.55598579@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20110325000931.GA21942@lemongrass.antoszka.pl> <20110325074824.TAf2c206.tv@veller.net> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:36:14 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7vACWEp5cYcdEJSNLbSAIYp7bgU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 17729b9050a377d5c85c6a3148a51706 On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> - keys are revoked [3] >> >> yes > > To facilitate this, should we pick a preferred keyserver or two? =A0Devs > of course are welcome to use others also, but if we're going to check > for revocations, we should specify where devs should upload them to in > order to make sure they hit the tree/etc. > > The preference need not be strictly applied, but even though those > keyservers are supposed to talk to each other I've found that I get > fairly different results if I refresh against various ones. in practice, i think we've been requiring hkp://subkeys.pgp.net -mike