From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OVU2o-00062V-7V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:35:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31E7CE0AD4; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66BDE0ACE for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so3615355fxm.40 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:35:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=L1g+lTyVnUQsdcPgKE6/CKSA1219jrIMiiR+zB4FYRw=; b=Cf0fIeGNVagbhsKWsVR72Gcyx9elyiJWwat2v5iBhf2Du4k5XJXbO4LoMmhHUVKNxW q+qA2n/9WK3kck/qjivroEWHLnZR/sCWadjLN+FeA3HEqaclqSpSbERPoLZxTKHVOtCm Au354zKdpp7i7FEKZgU6vMccscfHeJFNL+5JI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hqbcGH61W9QIm95dVHxZ52mBa72Rp++IKokVqHGfMi1CQnRZ/Y5y8mdcA0I7JaSkRP GwLJzse1N7F4GzOK+Uw3lq6XMi+UEbAJUuEoxyW6fa0bmZjbL2CZ2fHJXsRCT6qXCO5o GA2cYS/WD/m28vkk/q7pXI9ZncRXbZYCAAMKs= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.49.12 with SMTP id b12mr143185muk.33.1278268540046; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.221.7 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 11:35:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:35:40 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 31cxSqEply4AWASXgYfsXrwkIrU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 0ae9f601-faf4-4f7f-98a7-8256b55027cb X-Archives-Hash: 87167477cd745197e5db20a6cf6dba4c That would be the best but I wonder who has the time to even support this maintenance mode. We could ask for help from our user community. Maybe some of our users are quite familiar with the code and be able to pick up the load fast enough On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there > that are using OpenRC then? > OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a big improvement over the old stuff. I > am for fixing current bugs, and keep it maintenance mode at least. > I'm already spread over several things but I could give a hand to > other devs willing to take over. > > -- > Fabio Erculiani > http://www.sabayon.org > http://www.gentoo.org > >