From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OT9Qc-0001YP-K2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93ABFE0FE1; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9C7E0FB6 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so471243iwn.40 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=AE8jentqDKw9CZEGEEJsLU4Hh1kPOGgoEEu38BY9L6o=; b=G1d7n5hIJIUnLQmj/NaQrdPn/TKBEKDSD6rpoqs8zJK0FGN/hvqMPEhpA1OpKhIdar +AJWz2bV6NxtDwO/e0S8ePE6L/3oQoisQAaGhoHw2AiR2yXfj3yuFTQ+JrmdmdQNc7YX zKutjesYgbmK/Lp4GZ179WXzWuB+G0iZ9T/M8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LYcy3D/Rzz/xNOeths5l0D1Foelc4ebNw8581V5OcSEauxwuGfwAA4hvxXN0lIrWWk RPC76KpStGv54BshX+p//tUSZdjg0NugPjd8+eMoVD1Ve6nj9Y9jwC4pNk38uxTY3GoB rMR4tCCg1d0Ybh080Ssu5ijMav7/snSV0XzAE= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.145 with SMTP id b17mr5035248ibl.187.1277712646852; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.150.68 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C285876.4020208@gentoo.org> References: <20100628083559.2c810fda@snowcone> <4C2852F6.30003@gentoo.org> <20100628085119.1631337d@snowcone> <4C285876.4020208@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:40:46 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TEnRhqNNtLoWWbLF0RJmp0zGF5U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 27f50931-1fea-41f4-9019-46ebacc06cef X-Archives-Hash: a07a647477627d13733029a538749bc3 On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 06/28/2010 10:51 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Will Gentoo be doing the same for -Ofast and its flags then? After all, >> most packages work with them, and you can't let the few packages that >> require standard-compliant behaviour from a compiler hold Gentoo >> hostage. >> > > This is not about optimizing but preventing clear breakage, the benefits > of asneeded are not under debate here (like already stated in the > original message this thread started from) > > So please stop trying to derail the thread > ++, all of this has been discussed to *death*. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team