From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41610-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OT9Qc-0001YP-K2
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:54 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93ABFE0FE1;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9C7E0FB6
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so471243iwn.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
:in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=AE8jentqDKw9CZEGEEJsLU4Hh1kPOGgoEEu38BY9L6o=;
b=G1d7n5hIJIUnLQmj/NaQrdPn/TKBEKDSD6rpoqs8zJK0FGN/hvqMPEhpA1OpKhIdar
+AJWz2bV6NxtDwO/e0S8ePE6L/3oQoisQAaGhoHw2AiR2yXfj3yuFTQ+JrmdmdQNc7YX
zKutjesYgbmK/Lp4GZ179WXzWuB+G0iZ9T/M8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=LYcy3D/Rzz/xNOeths5l0D1Foelc4ebNw8581V5OcSEauxwuGfwAA4hvxXN0lIrWWk
RPC76KpStGv54BshX+p//tUSZdjg0NugPjd8+eMoVD1Ve6nj9Y9jwC4pNk38uxTY3GoB
rMR4tCCg1d0Ybh080Ssu5ijMav7/snSV0XzAE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.82.145 with SMTP id b17mr5035248ibl.187.1277712646852;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.150.68 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C285876.4020208@gentoo.org>
References: <AANLkTikRpyKw2cXXQ0NfvXoqbod5vVmLBLhZWDbx3Ytx@mail.gmail.com>
<20100628083559.2c810fda@snowcone>
<4C2852F6.30003@gentoo.org>
<20100628085119.1631337d@snowcone>
<4C285876.4020208@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:40:46 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TEnRhqNNtLoWWbLF0RJmp0zGF5U
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRT1C7J7VqEcOWiyn4mpn65VOoYJx8x9_RFGs2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in
profiles/default/linux/make.defaults
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 27f50931-1fea-41f4-9019-46ebacc06cef
X-Archives-Hash: a07a647477627d13733029a538749bc3
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 10:51 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Will Gentoo be doing the same for -Ofast and its flags then? After all,
>> most packages work with them, and you can't let the few packages that
>> require standard-compliant behaviour from a compiler hold Gentoo
>> hostage.
>>
>
> This is not about optimizing but preventing clear breakage, the benefits
> of asneeded are not under debate here (like already stated in the
> original message this thread started from)
>
> So please stop trying to derail the thread
>
++, all of this has been discussed to *death*.
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team