From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OKBek-0000Qz-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:44:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC32FE08C6; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE9AE1272 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so152647fxm.40 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:44:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=WYTpB2XzEPOqBDXNkEioiEH+qytiUW+2MV7E58K5WQ4=; b=SDMh0syWDjS/Ws5yUULK4AOq1god7YqhpFhYPZZr1cCb/E+7IhTSMe2rqUMi1vQoJh LfE5C7iYnljNMoc2EYq/r597Dcq7StwJve//m7OldJVEoHUmKDEm5rNv2f8KbhquWLng 8v5eGsXPDiDWSZNQTsFTEdfO995V6AxjXWShc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BonoTT+mPHEMQx8EkJcBdnZIaFUuEwJTpWFvuuJCjuQQhvILCbg6/Hx2UReemP5gmb SG2qxR+CmXZUiWFSEv16aCWSNrp3Fz/YqGjEf+NCMrf2ynIo6WaLEnLoGOGse41W4Vxk hKI3imfFW+5r+/n8sq4KV37DTpEjPtFPxm7wM= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.15.22 with SMTP id 22mr3484552muo.7.1275576250782; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.24.10 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 07:44:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C07BC29.2090006@gentoo.org> References: <4C0785C0.3080700@gentoo.org> <1275570192.7629.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4C07BC29.2090006@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:44:10 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3eGtZyJKqMC7TaX0JYwsg-1vjws Message-ID: Subject: Re: Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR: media-optical@g.o has no developers) From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a4594fd5cb0488213d50 X-Archives-Salt: 264da9aa-6f38-4649-a015-bb4967f47455 X-Archives-Hash: ec184c08a86554215bda8ea68d0c40b2 --00163649a4594fd5cb0488213d50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable all the gnome-* herds look obsolete to me. It should be like kde and use only one alias. Further more the comm-fax could be merged with a net-* alias, and all the desktop-* could be merged in one herd. The dev-embedded could be merged with embedded, kernel can merge with kernel-misc. Plus I a= m sure that we can perform a clean up/merge on net-* herds. Same rule for sci-*. Having 150 herds for 300 *listed* devs doesn't seem optimal On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:28 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 6/3/10 3:32 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,a= s > I > > see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of > > developers. > > Here are some more empty herds: > > 1) kerberos herd is empty :( > 2) secure-tunnelling is empty > 3) utf8 is empty and looks like a candidate for removal > > As for other herds, I don't see anything obviously wrong. It seems fine > and useful to have a generic alias even if there is only one developer > in a herd. > > Pawe=C5=82 > > --00163649a4594fd5cb0488213d50 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable all the gnome-* herds look obsolete to me. It should be like kde and use on= ly one alias. Further more the comm-fax could be merged with a net-* alias,= and all the desktop-* could be merged in one herd. =C2=A0The dev-embedded = could be merged with embedded, =C2=A0kernel can merge with kernel-misc. Plu= s I am sure that we can perform a clean up/merge on net-* herds. Same rule = for sci-*. Having 150 herds for 300 *listed* devs doesn't seem optimal<= br>
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:28 PM, "Pawe= =C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
On 6/3/10 3:32 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,= as I
> see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of<= br> > developers.

Here are some more empty herds:

1) kerberos herd is empty :(
2) secure-tunnelling is empty
3) utf8 is empty and looks like a candidate for removal

As for other herds, I don't see anything obviously wrong. It seems fine=
and useful to have a generic alias even if there is only one developer
in a herd.

Pawe=C5=82


--00163649a4594fd5cb0488213d50--