From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Christian Ruppert <idl0r@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:18:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin99E9xMv0BKCd6pmiN9v3wyLTyeWsRZbDtnSSv@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D737C71.1040806@gentoo.org>
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Christian Ruppert <idl0r@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> in bugzilla-4.x they did change the "Status Workflow"[1].
>
[snip]
>
> We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for bugs.gentoo.org.
> So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old?
>
I'm not attached to the names we use for the various bug statuses. I
would suggest that we follow the path that makes things easiest for
future maintenance and upgrades.
As for the removal of REOPENED, I guess that information will still be
visible via the "bug history" button? It shouldn't be a problem then.
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-06 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-06 12:22 [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Christian Ruppert
2011-03-06 12:45 ` Petteri Räty
2011-03-06 12:55 ` Christian Ruppert
2011-03-06 12:48 ` Nirbheek Chauhan [this message]
2011-03-06 12:50 ` Brian Harring
2011-03-07 7:24 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-03-07 10:13 ` Brian Harring
2011-03-10 11:10 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-03-10 11:15 ` Markos Chandras
2011-03-10 16:04 ` Mike Gilbert
2011-03-10 19:42 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-03-10 20:06 ` Amadeusz Żołnowski
2011-03-11 3:52 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-03-11 4:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2011-03-06 13:17 ` Christian Faulhammer
2011-03-07 23:17 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-03-06 13:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2011-03-06 13:50 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-06 15:44 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-03-07 8:34 ` Michał Górny
2011-03-07 10:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-28 14:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Ruppert
2011-04-28 15:06 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2011-04-30 8:01 ` Peter Volkov
2011-04-28 15:07 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-30 8:40 ` Christian Ruppert
2011-05-01 9:39 ` Christian Ruppert
2011-05-01 9:58 ` Christian Ruppert
2011-05-01 1:24 ` Maciej Mrozowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTin99E9xMv0BKCd6pmiN9v3wyLTyeWsRZbDtnSSv@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nirbheek@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=idl0r@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox