From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPIvm-00040d-5u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:31:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56A5DE0AE1; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE4FE0ABA for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so4173fxm.40 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=bwwjS9rzhcBCe0lSjIscXjKYKpPAuTf2d9osvnPyLeU=; b=TrJ9Q/Z2N0Kijpw9rqUWB8+BcLrw3d3ypqTjvKmhQXSwjK21UfGXJNt2G98D9Phent 3eE/+152/yJSvQwRdf/vD+2piJyS5xlc7Mptodr6kqCkqDeKyX0goPyRPw5UvfhTKesv fSFQZixqAu6P3Hyk+k2GXyWfQKcuqgC4dssOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rUFKm0goXvN1ShpZIqHBx7e6lqaTXpDkHgecqKxNAkBdqFx1KlrgD4NpGSanJ6zXOS buTRB8DpDCkjG04zcHBegjj7bsaCvNQJXd9479ul8J16scVNziVjKGiOfyKYPf2Q4CJZ WYGXihnXKfQ9ktfPlczCFrEhVExFmOcBzLn0k= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.80.1 with SMTP id h1mr3538875mul.120.1276795741545; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.24.10 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100608195911.GA20808@muiri> References: <20100602071850.GA25028@veller.net> <20100608111406.GA2132@muiri> <20100608182517.0ba1b80b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20100608195911.GA20808@muiri> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:29:01 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KyOx94WKI-k2Oyri9AaY7kJz7zU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f986a0249504893d2c34 X-Archives-Salt: 12364053-a735-4b7e-a1c2-e5a88807b056 X-Archives-Hash: 837a1057ce4f700c4dab284859e33ed5 --0016e659f986a0249504893d2c34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/6/8 Jos=E9 Mar=EDa > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200 > > Jos=E9 Mar=EDa Alonso wrote: > > > > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package: > > > > > > > app-doc/repodoc > > > > > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do > > > I have to do?. > > > > You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four > > outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on > > those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course. > > Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too. > > > > > > Regards, > > jer > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Drepodoc > > > > Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction. > I'll begin to work in those bugs. > > Cheers. > > Ok, then I won't mask this package for removal ( I was about to do it rig= ht now when I accidentally remembered this thread ) for now. If the bugs are still unresolved after 30 days I will have to mask it for removal. In the meantime, if you have working patches for the repodoc bugs [1], I can commi= t them for you and proxy this package for you until you gain tree access [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Drepodoc --0016e659f986a0249504893d2c34 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2010/6/8 Jos=E9 Mar=EDa <nimiux@gentoo.= org>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roove= rs wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> Jos=E9 Mar=EDa Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
> >
> > > app-doc/repodoc
>
> > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do
> > I have to do?.
>
> You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four
> outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on<= br> > those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course.
> Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too.
>
>
> Regards,
> =A0 =A0 =A0jer
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Drep= odoc
>

Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction.
I'll begin to work in those bugs.

Cheers.

Ok, then I won't mask this package for removal ( I w= as about to do it right now when I=A0accidentally remembered this thread ) = for now. If the bugs are still unresolved after 30 days I will have to mask= it for removal. In the meantime, if you have working patches for the repod= oc bugs [1], I can commit them for you and proxy this package for you until= you gain tree access

--0016e659f986a0249504893d2c34--