[gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT

[gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT

[Ben de Groot]

There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
problem by renaming it.

Cheers,
Ben


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org>
Date: 27 May 2010 10:44
Subject: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by
preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
To: yngwin@gentoo.org


DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:

Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061


ssuominen@gentoo.org changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Summary|media-libs/libpng-1.4.2     |media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2
                  |update not handled by       |update not handled by
                  |preserved-libs due to       |preserved-libs due to
                  |uninstall of older SLOT     |uninstall of older SLOT



--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT

[Samuli Suominen]

On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
> problem by renaming it.

No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.

It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the
(unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the
$summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for.

Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now.

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org>
> Date: 27 May 2010 10:44
> Subject: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by
> preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
> To: yngwin@gentoo.org
> 
> 
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
> 
> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319061
> 
> 
> ssuominen@gentoo.org changed:
> 
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Summary|media-libs/libpng-1.4.2     |media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2
>                   |update not handled by       |update not handled by
>                   |preserved-libs due to       |preserved-libs due to
>                   |uninstall of older SLOT     |uninstall of older SLOT
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> 

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT

[Ben de Groot]

On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
>> problem by renaming it.
>
> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.
>
> It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the
> (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the
> $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for.
>
> Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now.

Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update?

Cheers,
Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT

[Samuli Suominen]

On 05/28/2010 12:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
>>> problem by renaming it.
>>
>> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.
>>
>> It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the
>> (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the
>> $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for.
>>
>> Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now.
> 
> Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 

If you have real bugs to report, open one per one package and make it
block the tracker 305095.  At the moment, there's none.

If you want to discuss about local upgrading problems, then use the
forums.  The ebuild already comes with the workaround script for the
broken .la files, and revdep-rebuild is in the gentoolkit package.