From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41573-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OSv7h-0006Ff-DI
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:54:28 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DCFBE0AAD;
Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:54:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C547E0AB7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4115A1C75161
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:53:57 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so827010wyg.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.88.147 with SMTP id a19mr2661205wef.93.1277657636561; Sun,
27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.184.130 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity>
References: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:53:56 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimm1TIJaCiLc_DoCXzR8o4aNbN043oblPwNj9l8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations
From: Auke Booij <auke@tulcod.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 9224dd80-50db-4f66-abad-c9c944403349
X-Archives-Hash: 677cd3b150585e66e85315d03d3186c2
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Thoughts?
If Gentoo doesn't seem to have time to maintain the stable tree, why
have it in the first place? What really is the advantage of having a
stable tree?