From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSv7h-0006Ff-DI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:54:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DCFBE0AAD; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C547E0AB7 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4115A1C75161 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:53:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so827010wyg.40 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.147 with SMTP id a19mr2661205wef.93.1277657636561; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.184.130 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> References: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:53:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations From: Auke Booij To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 9224dd80-50db-4f66-abad-c9c944403349 X-Archives-Hash: 677cd3b150585e66e85315d03d3186c2 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > Thoughts? If Gentoo doesn't seem to have time to maintain the stable tree, why have it in the first place? What really is the advantage of having a stable tree?