From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q228J-0002eu-HO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:00:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 683E21C054; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E481C00A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so8570846fxm.40 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6EbpDFt4cLewiWPPmLSdY6JpGwKoz+uOeXqzXrj0hs=; b=A3bF5FCqRDimldKy1WrgIx4X7yX0YiwSMTygerSTuRna1igliR0Sq+sPOswlH5mnrz geIdEMxqsYDC+eAPDimZQfA3JSFMB85pRpnpxXEK1V3ZAU+tuusA6Po+7TQPyYPiTN0n Jsnl8GP66zRSEpBiI943iOfL8qXFu6bmDdFPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GWQDfEKcjgnjxInK44b7trLZeX0yyRapqIfLj/6eQwayIDTFvLqvQF3kjq/DFFx5uk 8YdJpMIgpr/pYHK/kKN0Rih0w2+mfu/XmPjuIkVt8tDY9HsAu368zVYV8keLEcCoKV0y d+dmj9mNtljuXHB1f7nQ8Dcnas0yD3HlitAvk= Received: by 10.223.15.141 with SMTP id k13mr1564248faa.30.1300802388424; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.5.15 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:59:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1300797343.2499.2.camel@tablet> References: <4D7886F8.2030507@gentoo.org> <1299750299.2212.57.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> <4D78A04F.3070206@gentoo.org> <1299754174.2212.62.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> <1300797343.2499.2.camel@tablet> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:59:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qu98mWlWTrJS3pTdXXppFu6TuUo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Making largefile a global use To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bd2b342db70ea5070a65fcef918c47e5 On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 10/03/2011 =D0=B2 11:49 +0100, Diego Elio Pett= en=C3=B2 =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> Any configure with AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will get a >> --enable-largefile option, but if you grep through the tree, this is >> usually simply added unconditionally. > > Is there any value adding --enable-largefile? autoconf macros have it > enabled by default. developers need not go through the source and manually verify that the package is using AC_SYS_LARGEFILE and is enabled by default ? -mike