From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44929-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q2t1r-0000Z1-Kj
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:29:19 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28E101C0F2;
	Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC9F1C02F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwj7 with SMTP id 7so108550pwj.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=X6SPlcQTQogtUmldjTgorXKmce82xH84GjYFwhjZVmY=;
        b=Dpq5IcwlqG6d4R5w62aC/GLlj9pK+9iMITjkbdWbaxtXDcIJ4zWd4Uue9tAUb6jOOc
         dbm/8xarmWeyIgckj4pc+Ur07K59MFl6VFDUv4ZDAbT2eO3UAACMMa3YVGeGh1mYqRVg
         wnhmZWBOLO0y1n+1L2vqktztRe8KGWFV0zlic=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=JL1U+1GxNXCXYKl51CCc+I6rchLz15jWqsOjrW6Dk3F25ZOmrQo+A9a9Rbjq8hb4/g
         sBKMJ1aw9dEhv5uBAOwRbKbOS6hn8xPUV7rj85RYVDI2lmTbnwE3mnelQc75Z+5/GDuz
         z8/EXRr/Vvs6wpGe15aKdoro5ExutKvkMmEz8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.27.13 with SMTP id e13mr27231wfj.336.1301005724405; Thu,
 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.221.19 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:28:44 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJAuw1n8U3KyxFSVEwKfpkkWmrvgYgFM-bpB=h@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
From: Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: c7534c28aee02199d3f397d39a351e1f

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
> Manifest's anymore ? =C2=A0generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is
> ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have
> done this already.
>

Is there some plan to make verification of signed Manifests
easy/automatic for end users? Or am I misunderstanding the point of
Manifest signing?