From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41486-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OR4YB-00025s-AE
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:34:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 050A2E0AC7;
	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966A7E09FD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:33:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so1701619gwj.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=82I+jrFcKaErWEMJApa6DWbudI8AI1yF8jdtI94htGY=;
        b=HstQrnH+yPUq9Ag2rHX6Ttq6FY2Ei/ZipWNPubgqYwChxQFPBN4LQrW4yAWC+/34y8
         xD6zq4BzWfR1DOReez/fWS0duzkiEZ9ZAXQGaTURXy2a3JL4CSza6HJU5voCiWkXi+8y
         Z2NXgeV5/g3DmBJJVCWfiuEEYG+Oy+Mll18b4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=O3eLV0QPIuyvUTPtPw1VQ0ZyB4nrlFBGGO5Aqdjzjvk0b6T7WPA/6mnvnfzfD3jG6r
         smZwuOeiFMc/jVjUsZJOwllP3tYtlFr77Z2p+ajZLGmalHggJPEsTBEi+jHcGs8eJmbU
         QpO0oTy2b6ESznqM/T9NfUHMp5A80b8ATsFZY=
Received: by 10.229.192.10 with SMTP id do10mr3400781qcb.84.1277217222730; 
	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: arunissatan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.203.70 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1277205855.29893.1.camel@lillen>
References: <AANLkTimjJIGW6k5vQCX-wryeYy_FPUTQpRN7jmW4xRKN@mail.gmail.com> 
	<201006210933.57444.reavertm@gmail.com> <1277130128.7004.43.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> 
	<201006211744.38483.reavertm@gmail.com> <AANLkTimsfkguhWaIz7HogHqllXzg774LFD5voaxVyEKr@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTikqPLQBX-ZKGhpEsG4lpoTH_WdEi-eRqaZHpF3k@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277205855.29893.1.camel@lillen>
From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:03:22 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: IdUebU9PEiZFaBtISMEvr3S5P4U
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDt5RFik_jZZ4nsJS_UvGn9wSSTpcl_a5-Q_1r@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: e1c5d04e-bc13-43fa-a37c-92d9649c7d3f
X-Archives-Hash: fde98b350f1d58d656089d79b936a50d

On 22 June 2010 16:54, Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@rymdraket.net> wrote:
> tis 2010-06-22 klockan 15:17 +0530 skrev Arun Raghavan:
>> On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>> > I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns
>> > about "introspection" being too generic and non GNOME-y, but "gir" is
>> > likely to cause confusion.
>>
>> "gir" is not good because it gives near-zero information.
>>
>> I can still not think of short enough USE flag. I propose we stick to
>> "introspection". There isn't anything on the horizon that might
>> overlap with this flag, and I don't see why we should drop using a
>> simpler flag for the *possibility* that it might overlap with
>> something else in the future. We can deal with this if it happens.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Why not just gintrospection?

I still think "introspection" is easier to grok. It's unlikely that
it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other
packages in the future, so let's stick with "introspection" please.

-- 
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)