From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41445-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OQYrt-00072v-6c
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:44:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28330E0815;
	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192CAE0809
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:44:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so994396vws.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Qv2jj5kvFHNvBuN4jl+aiYD5GpIxlPXCOQwKkAqIkRA=;
        b=hhwUlKJ6LGVX8PG5bQoaoQ2nuC677gDPVNpXspLaZgkYRk8KLX35zw7zj4Czgj5aR+
         aBHb93BCjO3zSmLGqn6ouMRQFW+cUTpz2eOIANXcb/YpQBQhVgLHXS2z39Qivpc/y4np
         HAAvd2J7vmQQBIijvBzRvKyFnnWloNYZUS0R4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=v74n7P96KAjz9cmnt+3rYcE46OhdXrQacqVBAyQqC5v5anHSidncMnYXBN5T3ClPaB
         uymmYs+2V6pyIpi6aNUlEpD2x3YtIR9jZJxuIyvuvDeI7xt8qn64r71wpa1+sUkQasbM
         CExQsSFa14agTAItxL2MdrWaBCDyH6ka7G3hI=
Received: by 10.220.124.129 with SMTP id u1mr1795887vcr.47.1277095456366; Sun, 
	20 Jun 2010 21:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: arunissatan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.200.141 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1277064857.7004.1.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca>
References: <AANLkTimjJIGW6k5vQCX-wryeYy_FPUTQpRN7jmW4xRKN@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277064857.7004.1.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca>
From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:13:56 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wL8Z1c2Qj1z8CYy2XmaLjyt-bqE
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8DPwexc8kSkeoZfHMfIx1AwOBc_6SUoEi1_0c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cr=EAte?= <tester@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gnome@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: e6cd1b3e-0fb8-417e-8e58-49d6d0ada65a
X-Archives-Hash: 891dfb629864ad44d1f664dc800f0227

2010/6/21 Olivier Cr=EAte <tester@gentoo.org>:
> On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 20:12 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection.
> ...
>> Any objections? I'll wait till Wed (June 23rd) before adding this if
>> there aren't any.
>
> Do we really want it to be a USE flag ? I would force it on always for
> everyone. Due to the direction in which GNOME is heading, it will be
> required by the core desktop anyway.

In addition to what Nirbheek pointed out, I think a USE flag would be
useful for embedded setups where you might only want introspection for
a subset of libraries.

I do agree with you about it being part of the core desktop and
required by most users, so it will be enabled by default for all
ebuilds.

Cheers,
--=20
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)