From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHkKJ-0001OH-TI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 598DBE0AB5; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6308AE08D5 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2386467fgg.10 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=4ONbOGEyKwngkuQ+pyKUVg8zE0gqViTNBiCMURksFu4=; b=TtLaA6KomtJeOsHeWm5dMyRXTVRUBqipkjjlbmJxXsfn/UowCDM3APCzOXnrBRTLoz 5h4qzyTtyoku+xy2hk+N+knm0i16kKA0mIB6fsssRotUCgcM3yZL4KpbkA25XwJl6vYj p1iTQK6AJ9XjOuRkT+YEM67Mq4v6MxNNXWWQk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SDWiTqgkv5hDSJL1OY9+b8kehyHS9IP4j23lJbKVJxggh+dWX16Ufybe8r7CUZN3Wn c3zzd3YCsT4nXn3E7E6Xd9N7C0Fz9DjVa/66FgXAPK27QnZB6p/O5H1iAm9Kgt5yRMxe zZvPKdESc+cR/xQZU87eeq/7f3SBAjEX69ttA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.12.17 with SMTP id 17mr6866570mul.36.1274994541658; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.174.7 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFEDB9D.2000803@gentoo.org> References: <4BFEDB9D.2000803@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:01 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6SMvHV_Kc5lTSUJ8b-c3Daw3Jp4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 48622f47-a5b8-4a47-a676-45c3a24ddbc3 X-Archives-Hash: 86157f542ca88234be7896304649a677 On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the >> problem by renaming it. > > No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature. > > It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the > (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the > $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for. > > Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now. Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update? Cheers, Ben