From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41028-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OHkKJ-0001OH-TI
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 598DBE0AB5;
Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6308AE08D5
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2386467fgg.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
:in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=4ONbOGEyKwngkuQ+pyKUVg8zE0gqViTNBiCMURksFu4=;
b=TtLaA6KomtJeOsHeWm5dMyRXTVRUBqipkjjlbmJxXsfn/UowCDM3APCzOXnrBRTLoz
5h4qzyTtyoku+xy2hk+N+knm0i16kKA0mIB6fsssRotUCgcM3yZL4KpbkA25XwJl6vYj
p1iTQK6AJ9XjOuRkT+YEM67Mq4v6MxNNXWWQk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=SDWiTqgkv5hDSJL1OY9+b8kehyHS9IP4j23lJbKVJxggh+dWX16Ufybe8r7CUZN3Wn
c3zzd3YCsT4nXn3E7E6Xd9N7C0Fz9DjVa/66FgXAPK27QnZB6p/O5H1iAm9Kgt5yRMxe
zZvPKdESc+cR/xQZU87eeq/7f3SBAjEX69ttA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.12.17 with SMTP id 17mr6866570mul.36.1274994541658; Thu,
27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.174.7 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BFEDB9D.2000803@gentoo.org>
References: <bug-319061-15115@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
<comment-1274949866-bug-319061-15115@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
<AANLkTimube_oqsilXt2hJAcpgt0SktxJHVVIsNcJTPnJ@mail.gmail.com>
<4BFEDB9D.2000803@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:01 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6SMvHV_Kc5lTSUJ8b-c3Daw3Jp4
Message-ID: <AANLkTilZzWeKt7cn27XXtSDZg4zgivk_L0JNNLBGI6BK@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not
handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 48622f47-a5b8-4a47-a676-45c3a24ddbc3
X-Archives-Hash: 86157f542ca88234be7896304649a677
On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
>> problem by renaming it.
>
> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.
>
> It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the
> (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the
> $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for.
>
> Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now.
Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update?
Cheers,
Ben