From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OOkn2-0002Iq-OV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:03:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F88AE0BB8; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F68E0B05 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so79664pwi.40 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.61.35 with SMTP id j35mr5841480wfa.124.1276664620123; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.142.200.1 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:03:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C184607.5080907@gentoo.org> References: <4C184607.5080907@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:03:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zwjwy3xUD0S19gpNX2n2A2rfte0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d1f08296-bb20-41bf-904e-4442b90697d4 X-Archives-Hash: 5e1893142622421d9b1ba9958048b2e9 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote= : > Hello! > > > Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo. > > As I have heard there are people not joining Gentoo because the > atmosphere in Gentoo is lacking respect and empathy. > > I have searched a few places for rules on tone, looking at the Gentoo > Social Contract [1], the Code of Conduct [2] and the Philosophy of > Gentoo [3]. =C2=A0In a way the Code of Conduct defines what good and bad > behavior is. =C2=A0The term "Acceptable behaviour" may make sense as a > counterpart to "Unacceptable behaviour" but feels like "what you can get > away with" to me anyhow. We had enumerated bad behavior in the past and people walked the line (Ciaran is a good example; but there were others.) We had a rather open policy where DevRel had leeway to 'take necessary action' and community members cried out for abuse due to lack of transparency. We had COC enforcers that would attempt to moderate mailing list traffic. I don't think any of these were a raging success. I like the open policy one because I think it makes DevRel's job easier and the buck needs to stop somewhere. Here is a hint; if you want to stay on as a developer; don't piss of HR (or infra, or probably a number of other groups that could make your life hell.) > > What is surprising me: > > =C2=A0- How come tone is so rough when we actually meant to be > =C2=A0 a friendly community? =C2=A0Has it always been that way? I don't see the tone as tough; but you have to understand that I work with a bunch of socially inept engineers on a daily basis. People writing dumb crap in email is something that happens every day. I think a lot of the 'bad' threads people just reply to email every 5-10 minutes (I used to do this years ago...) Stop reading email that often. Reply to a thread once a day. If you need to converse in real time you can use jabber or irc or whatever. You tend to reach a logical consensus quicker over chat than over email. Avoid people you know you interact badly with. Do Not Feed The Trolls. I remember at work often I'd be dragged into a thread with one of the Ganeti guys; he would complain about how cfengine was awesome and puppet was crap. I tended to stop replying to that guy when that subject came up (he is a nice fellow; but holy lord the puppet vs cfengine debate could rage forever.) > > =C2=A0- With these Code of Conduct rules in place how come DevRel > =C2=A0 is not publicly reminding of these rules where necessary? Probably because DevRel is small. If the community expects people to act a certain way I'd expect 'the community' to call people on it; not necessarily just DevRel. > > Could it be we expect perfection from each other instead seeking to > understand and complement each other? =C2=A0What can we do to make Gentoo= a > friendlier community? I haven't seen the crazy crap on the lists that was present in 2007-2008 so I'm actually fairly happy with the current style. I'd love to throw around more compliments but I tend to compliment people by using their software and sending them patches...or making fun of them on IRC, either way. > > Thanks for your interest, > > > > Sebastian > > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contract.xml > [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml > [3] http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/philosophy.xml > >