From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSykR-0007wc-7y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:46:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4007E0BE1; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1200E0B4F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so34635iwn.40 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=CUBPrvqd9fBV6fGI0+hIuJ9yO1Xz6WFYg/jPyMsdyps=; b=c8zdlbtAN8bIdtBPT7gdInAwYsolwyEh+AVKlJ6ofcYbJ+/ozBK+DIwdXGR1yjeE9O VhkzeWlFK0tawV6EQjlpodJmZgH+NdR2062vda4J5U28Ap55auICpfwWdp8Sj+wItazr 1hAHUCVYiQeOS8l1H/67g14NNt3pbG731H1GA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZOiyZEh8gUPxaqiFobMMhQE+UlHQnDJY0y/lixuse/8aa+lkzLnbHQdI4hQoHRUYKB 3NyLq6vd4k/zGU298qKUU8W7O9EYRaGKWyL3bzj6EnLhIvmCy6EFtTW/zQdWnP3lefpG zPXvA0aD0zsfVPooMcByF9GbynMMeanWVg25I= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.169.9 with SMTP id w9mr4593761iby.58.1277671579373; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.150.68 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100627103545.GB23460@nibiru.local> References: <20100625201738.GA4789@nibiru.local> <4C2518FB.9090800@gentoo.org> <20100626185104.GB4789@nibiru.local> <4C265345.6060102@gentoo.org> <20100626194639.GE4789@nibiru.local> <20100626205921.4e2a0b9e@snowcone> <20100627103545.GB23460@nibiru.local> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:16:19 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lvVPRojZO4Vm6rfg_xwpJohONJk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9487d787-5cb3-44fc-ad05-1f6c58d0a003 X-Archives-Hash: db2f7acd310ef21de47ff0580231bd56 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb: > >> Or if they generate the tarball on-the-fly with no caching, which >> results in differing timestamps each time. Hence, each time you fetch >> it, you get a tarball with a different hash. > > Does portage check the timestamps ? > I think you need to sit down and understand how tarballs are made, what they contain, and what a "hash" means, and how it's calculated. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team