From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OGfxW-0001be-Fr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:17:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0108E09E7; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E6CE09A6 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1614582fgg.10 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MsTH5040OYCT4kIc1/5230lqlicby20vGIImTjY6LE8=; b=Sb8XsySua+DcB/t08aek4Mz8jcaNjWfAxagp09epgfp/RxRAQ8mhb9pihHkBZHuOrJ /K5hNDidJumtn6N5kVhECrRqWXiUEqTlZfZqdicT0VQxkrb0X1tuHvO57xMoV0lWTDkV f7hUvycOwrSAstJk0y1ScWZis1LEiWQf5iB7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=kLKBw+LqSI4mKv8SJXi+8UfbMdQRYdxfYlTXK3eq0379anHM/3uIoBF0Eb89FlmXDv Bwi9jbbIlWrobfB838jsHP5/9K1wuEuiqRoR5tUVMfHKFXXI38+lr4fv6ifdBPWmLml2 3VxUliDLAVrdO8v+RMjCzJdAJVnSOeJDNK3wU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.149.36 with SMTP id b36mr4688552muo.56.1274739427083; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.233.7 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFAF569.8050009@gentoo.org> References: <201005231854.31921.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BFA3C7D.2040605@gentoo.org> <4BFAF569.8050009@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:17:07 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J-QKX5yOwirGCOLOLV-H3_sLV3Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass eautomake update From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8fcb0a55-dee5-4f9a-8b89-5904c4bbeefc X-Archives-Hash: 4c1215d8e61f4ea445d2e35d551e4788 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: >>> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. =A0hop= efully >>>> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who k= nows. >>>> >>>> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake failure, try backing out the >>>> autotools.eclass change first. >>> >>> I think any autotools.eclass behavior changes would benefit from being >>> sent to gentoo-dev for review first. >> >> if i felt most people had an understanding of how autotools worked let >> alone how autotools.eclass, then perhaps i would > > And what do you loose by sending them here? The devmanual text strictly > doesn't enforce it but strongly encourages: "Before updating eutils or a > similar widely used eclass, it is best to email the gentoo-dev list." so prove me wrong and post some useful feedback on the change. i'm simply being realistic. sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=3D1.97&r2=3D1.98 -mike