From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3Bq6-0000RS-30 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:34:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA1861C0E2; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD881C0DA for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1613121wwj.10 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Epf4aqhbE66NdZ+2/xXPqMTZCyVs3NkwcTDOrXmDT5A=; b=IyQtojCcPpWsSatX/aFFJlczs/oxub+32Wfm9IObhml2D6mXPYcsWf1q9/KxwSkSUZ cqrOrHxa4fCl0+hxnrWMi9iUQowcFOyE3iI8I/5SWZtSK5Th5IKK0gcvolLMBzbYAFCU 6VE8jk34LsyqMAJl1YBl/sMNW36BgGKnZkaFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=pmAFnDKcoMh0wGDC0L48uQ+OpYk6a6WtnFe0pxrPwAoxiK92WMgXLfS9GihX2V/W+L Dft2QzPOoboPlOIoj09Z8NXtGvpvVYTr+ow/mZYJlt3e0UQTnPGSSBXCxJiXeLStIwie tNo/UczHI4uzfA75AHrnflPdcnbSHQISj9Xr0= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.158.2 with SMTP id d2mr1097080wbx.65.1301078002876; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.147.82 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:33:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110325005026.55598579@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20110325000931.GA21942@lemongrass.antoszka.pl> <20110325074824.TAf2c206.tv@veller.net> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:33:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cPa3rbQ4l2oen2oz5LtXJmJ-qqE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Mike Frysinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e3d5532c5179857f15a004f1b2140634 On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> - keys are revoked [3] > > yes > To facilitate this, should we pick a preferred keyserver or two? Devs of course are welcome to use others also, but if we're going to check for revocations, we should specify where devs should upload them to in order to make sure they hit the tree/etc. The preference need not be strictly applied, but even though those keyservers are supposed to talk to each other I've found that I get fairly different results if I refresh against various ones. Rich