From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OaecY-0004vV-57 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:54:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DFF8E0BCD; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3F7E0A97 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so3287209bwz.40 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K0AcNcGHxNZA4uWofrQ1AopMbmXNaBPXYoPu2Gu9q1c=; b=RXymvoL/8L7pNbKEn9jTIaqN0ui+gsr5HolpnbEKqRvAM/ufUPz0KYV1r8OOG8IZIw EGY2TqO20mBHtJN0jW1f+LVj8kuf7Xh3a1o8Wa8Bxw781rv1uVZSVKLABNhqLBsbiZob 6+t9bLlwSNgFBkKQMqjHrMH9WUo9mRk8xWbXQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=VXJQhb8vXjgxpFMm8JUXgxz5TfTAsNpKkmmiRZ4z+jQYm1Mohx5cNgQ4LCekFp2WAE +am1bsdjyEnzb9sdC/9hYWC/rKeiGAhs3jlkfadpFuLi/iIvV+jd3dGJeZenSe3zGoEA lpAEDJu9DT8twt0FVdw3blGsuPHuMW4G383PM= Received: by 10.204.55.7 with SMTP id s7mr3380755bkg.70.1279500834345; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: p.jaroszynski@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.100.147 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:53:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100717220501.GA18099@linuxized.com> <20100717233326.GA28010@hrair> <4C427152.2090707@gentoo.org> <20100718080618.3ac114b3@gentoo.org> <20100718162121.634932cd@gentoo.org> <4C431ECC.10409@gentoo.org> <4C433D4F.1090209@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Piotr_Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:53:34 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FT8RQhPopwqSUGPwH1L29xZMKd8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d324bbb3-6321-45ec-999e-ed413aa7f5be X-Archives-Hash: 56e5b30e2666754c5be71fb2c9b0129c On 19 July 2010 01:27, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted: > >> It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for >> them to just go away. =C2=A0Once a thread goes to -project, it just whit= hers >> on the vine and nothing much happens. =C2=A0There may be a need for -pro= ject >> but if almost no one is going to be there, there is no point sending >> threads to it. =C2=A0Maybe developers should be required to subscribe to >> -project so that even if a thread is sent there, they still get to see >> the postings and deal with the issues that are being raised. > > I think that was the point. =C2=A0Having the list and telling people the = topic > belongs there is the polite way of telling them their output's better > directed to /dev/null (which is of course the the geeky *ix way of saying > "shutup already!"), without actually restricting someone's right to make > their point... just that they might as well be posting to their private > diary for the number of others that'll actually read it. Yeah, that's exactly a thread that belongs to -project and not -dev. --=20 Best Regards Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski