From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OR05Q-0000hu-L9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:48:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EA28E0A6F; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A9AE09B0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2so1454824vws.40 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=dK7UoPInEYEmQs/Folrj4p8CDQ70svIX3gQxnjj+RVw=; b=ET3V4Glbo4/+c9B2IHZNgs3zgkhXHXqPYhK053arY+C5b6a9luavt/OLDyelrHSMCY FqLP2mrxJHsn5+B/UGyupime/RPHIfM0/0b94TG+TG2bBFJrM4VNEDWW/zT2P76SGAiq 6kKRdAFEjCJxQBU4wG3nDfNGhO++y2Pp6G7/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=kXBszc/KCNvjDhY34anYXZKrwALEcsiN6sNlvNULiZmGixnsPQM90eJD7xZmTbhkjY H3Q5KkyHSHskzgwVyUWVHeJXFDQXFSrqZMG/P0PSHnBohSwgD/iqxrv11bT6TIbsyWa7 qYwEX3ZCZ3JJMtYIWREQIT4laPKqnR9ebHtgY= Received: by 10.220.124.129 with SMTP id u1mr3127158vcr.47.1277200062133; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: arunissatan@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.203.70 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:47:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201006210933.57444.reavertm@gmail.com> <1277130128.7004.43.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <201006211744.38483.reavertm@gmail.com> From: Arun Raghavan Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:17:22 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 91ioKysZXCKn9M4sY3A9kTkzujw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 108ecacc-8846-4319-a756-83d6fcd6afd7 X-Archives-Hash: 2cf88ddb4cecfaa9c3b947c545f773ef On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan wrote: [...] > I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns > about "introspection" being too generic and non GNOME-y, but "gir" is > likely to cause confusion. "gir" is not good because it gives near-zero information. I can still not think of short enough USE flag. I propose we stick to "introspection". There isn't anything on the horizon that might overlap with this flag, and I don't see why we should drop using a simpler flag for the *possibility* that it might overlap with something else in the future. We can deal with this if it happens. Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)