From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-42249-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Ok88r-0005Nd-5q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:14:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 580F0E095B; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66CFE0949 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 04:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so2766427fxm.40 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:14:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y0Ol+sGnIAeFgBtS+pCtXwT8BYGlHvVKMgUPS6aUzrA=; b=R3aHXpTuJU/DxaK+3HHJ/m9t/94sJm9xfyjpMn4hNCQ+plPyRgxDwWOCV12R4W2d2M NVLqVcjJdRgoSnJJOLHSJ2A0fzSHZqPiH6B/JXAzwFILqN+PDTmc/cwmMx8vIEDP4P8/ DX3uQRhEH8J3/djrOQeBbm9iSP05Bm6T+IHus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jVw7DsVvqBy5QrBxU3ZFEKRCN4c7vyJ3J/PUMf6m1TjkuthDzAvC4DZszDMowBWQO/ T6h8rn70fb+UvBirBhx2UzWTwUJW3U0G3JyTRgndy2hQRLeNpE+FB30CMsOWDieqzei3 zd3SNX4FkqEyB3NM3O/0F8TnO0nmOLFHShB7c= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.125.196 with SMTP id z4mr2824084far.80.1281759268324; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.109.134 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:14:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100813214335.4f0b83b9@gentoo.org> References: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical> <1281201535.29176.45.camel@yamato.local> <20100810215352.GA7980@Mystical> <AANLkTi=RoCPQ=8LXLN-hAKQ5owNbMVReY=Pn5ydoyyL2@mail.gmail.com> <20100812103557.7833d5b8@gentoo.org> <20100813151142.GA21041@Mystical> <20100813214335.4f0b83b9@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:14:28 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NYOdvxK7JrEi706C_sYlKffBuoM Message-ID: <AANLkTikmfGRDCizJeHEO2Tm-kQKg8JJqS2j-Gom7Vr_c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a3b0ab36-21aa-4211-a56e-8ce43871e76b X-Archives-Hash: c40f7292a262f856b806f71330516c47 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:11:42 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: >> Could someone guide me to add --hash-style=3Dgnu to default/linux/amd64/= dev >> profile? I don't want to break anything > > The thing is, you can't right now. :D =A0LDFLAGS don't stack, meaning you= 'd > have to do something like > > --- targets/developer/make.defaults =A0 =A0 26 Jul 2010 19:15:05 -0000 = =A0 =A0 =A01.9 > +++ targets/developer/make.defaults =A0 =A0 14 Aug 2010 03:31:18 -0000 > @@ -12,3 +12,6 @@ > > =A0# Log eqawarn messages > =A0PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES=3D"${PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES} qa" > + > +# Help find packages not respecting LDFLAGS > +LDFLAGS=3D"-Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu ${LDFLAGS}" > > > Which breaks boost-build (bug #293652). =A0That's why I suggested just pu= tting > a message in targets/developer/profile.bashrc (which is otherwise complet= ely > useless). that's crap. fix the package or at least work around it: LDFLAGS=3D`echo ${LDFLAGS}` we shouldnt be forced to add random hacks throughout the tree because of one or two random broken packages -mike