From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41066-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OKAXn-0001F5-4M
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:33:11 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AED44E0BDB;
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:33:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFD5E0BB6
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so93310fxm.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
:in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=ex4BchPdJJ0GiXrjVtTC0/HLMvZDJqn6KvXrw5kh1OY=;
b=NhOn/UKX8/ZAgmscrrN7FoSSQyncriwcfq4FFcJsLkgYHJFC/rcjVjOOIuxNXBwRQ1
Yjaskug8vIVpbeRXQnlJkgtk0LuYiHgaEOTTwdTnO9EdrbZpuy+qfx6Qxz4htVPu1AMa
DG1xIoNGKMRGeD8XuqVmkuFfJrqe4wYQJOEww=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=b4bzKHGwxPZPT7fAHlVgA6TMh3YzJ0DNzmHSxTYw29IA1wqMNps9gT9juIsjoQQ0/0
TZV+3ABJ6QRUsCqR/8uE97fb4KqxnYCLOO5HdZlpfgZpmvDd5PSmeOCQE1Pl3lPrhgGf
ZHa09nw42CZZelyzRHvFhKJFihAkEBHQM/Ytw=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.13.11 with SMTP id 11mr3436925mum.74.1275571979752; Thu,
03 Jun 2010 06:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.24.10 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 06:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1275570192.7629.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <4C0785C0.3080700@gentoo.org>
<1275570192.7629.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:32:59 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1_REPk9ylmLeLJtEi0HZnaov2fA
Message-ID: <AANLkTikhSADjKwX9eIXbj0cTmgmKFWczQJ4Iz-kTHu1u@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR:
media-optical@g.o has no developers)
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636499e53bd154d0488203e92
X-Archives-Salt: 1db175b9-e429-4bc2-8f2e-40c3378c4da2
X-Archives-Hash: e7e474c6c27ff2f7f40094b0b98ff844
--001636499e53bd154d0488203e92
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,as I
see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of
developers.
2010/6/3 Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
> El jue, 03-06-2010 a las 13:36 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribi=F3:
> > For the record, media-optical herd is currently without any devs and
> > also the mail alias in d.g.o is empty so nobody is really reading the
> > bugmail.
> >
> > In case you want to join it...
> >
> > - Samuli
>
> Would be possible to modify script that generates
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml to list
> empty herds on a different section at the top of the webpage for
> detecting herds without people easier?
>
> Even better would be to also provide information about "devway"
> developers, indicating something like, for example:
> 41. gnome
> - Description
> GNOME Desktop and related packages
> - Herd maintainers' email address
> gnome@gentoo.org
> - Maintainers
> ...
> pacho@gentoo.org (Pacho Ramos) (Devway)
>
> But I am not sure if it would be possible :-/
>
> Also, maybe we should consider change the assignment for bugs assigned
> to empty herds, assigning them to maintainers-needed and CCing affected
> herd, that way, once somebody revives the herd, he could simply revert
> the assign to the old way and, until then, people reviewing
> maintainers-needed bugs would also notice that bug reports.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
--001636499e53bd154d0488203e92
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,as I =
see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of devel=
opers.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2010/6/3 Pacho Ramos <span dir=3D"=
ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pacho@gentoo.org">pacho@gentoo.org</a>></span=
><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">El jue, 03-06-2010 a las 13:36 +0300, Samul=
i Suominen escribi=F3:<br>
> For the record, media-optical herd is currently without any devs and<b=
r>
> also the mail alias in d.g.o is empty so nobody is really reading the<=
br>
> bugmail.<br>
><br>
> In case you want to join it...<br>
><br>
> - Samuli<br>
<br>
Would be possible to modify script that generates<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml" tar=
get=3D"_blank">http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml<=
/a> to list<br>
empty herds on a different section at the top of the webpage for<br>
detecting herds without people easier?<br>
<br>
Even better would be to also provide information about "devway"<b=
r>
developers, indicating something like, for example:<br>
41. =A0gnome<br>
- Description<br>
GNOME Desktop and related packages<br>
- Herd maintainers' email address<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:gnome@gentoo.org">gnome@gentoo.org</a><br>
- Maintainers<br>
...<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:pacho@gentoo.org">pacho@gentoo.org</a> (Pacho Ramos) (Dev=
way)<br>
<br>
But I am not sure if it would be possible :-/<br>
<br>
Also, maybe we should consider change the assignment for bugs assigned<br>
to empty herds, assigning them to maintainers-needed and CCing affected<br>
herd, that way, once somebody revives the herd, he could simply revert<br>
the assign to the old way and, until then, people reviewing<br>
maintainers-needed bugs would also notice that bug reports.<br>
<br>
Thanks a lot<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
--001636499e53bd154d0488203e92--