From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41290-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OOyxM-0003Zm-FG
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:11:28 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39DEAE0905;
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F981E0849
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:11:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so407809gwb.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
:in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=2dYF9f//YzEgLtvKqy3OTHDEAnXnktjc6zXUKd4jKO4=;
b=o2n7SZ1zQt4fe/1CDGDgYP5DwQb6aPSfGuVFrJ05Y9XS1KbnnjdMDK0AW04z3Y4MhR
I8WoBTib3iSk/NsReMok+6QTlMMCfBeMrBl5+tsn9e29ChfWRAkaKbOCYsW4oaK4u7O/
fdjQ6wZVjvBpmpiLQvyArUu6raMzKYjnfWOGI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=OBO3+2wrpTM8jRd2ajJSQqk0IMowrsDaaLDY4612QMBDDEBbyDVD35nsEiKXoW3/t+
mkDToPp3HYkv03QrYBVxyS6+3mbjX9y2V+gvg+2JsN5BMeckap8LA6CkgVQpexf2hYsi
PWpB0mVguG4mBtfnsVJ7v6p0BekN9D1i9T2ws=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.193.40 with SMTP id v40mr7601186anp.204.1276719081875;
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.212.223 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1276718062.20001.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1276688510.6965.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<AANLkTilECMz2uNydqPPlzzhjXVyinvotOHemMARkYMBA@mail.gmail.com>
<1276718062.20001.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:11:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -PcRIWQdjx26hrvMaddWxUWAdRs
Message-ID: <AANLkTikgwkG0KQpXG42xFgrb4M1bwFycp5cNqS5Z2Aiu@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: c6326037-f341-4883-8d68-b9f746fd9a38
X-Archives-Hash: 4dcfdb624ebce3c93e3c9500d5338a4b
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mi=E9, 16-06-2010 a las 15:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribi=F3:
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> > Trying to move the following bug to upstream:
>> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253862
>> >
>> > He replied the following:
>> > "libtool doesn't support parallel make installs. Please file a bug
>> > upstream."
>> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28108#c1
>> >
>> >
>> > Is it true? Should -j1 be forced then for all installs relaying on
>> > libtool?
>>
>> ive seen no information to show that this isnt true. =A0Lennart needs to
>> provide real information explaining why he thinks his statement is
>> true.
>>
>> at any rate, why is this bug still open and why are you pushing it
>> upstream ? =A0it only applies to <=3D0.11, and 0.22 is stable in the tre=
e.
>
> It doesn't apply only to <=3D0.11, as can be seen in duplicates, it still
> affects to recent version appearing on some setups from time to time :-/
not all of those dupes are correct, or the same issue. like Bug
287389 which is a bug in the configure step due to a broken toolchain
(which is already fixed and is a dupe of a different bug). or libltdl
which features prominently in the oldest and no longer exists in
recent versions.
at any rate, you really should clean it up with the latest error, or
simply punt it in favor of only the latest relevant information (like
Bug 282730).
-mike