From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUk4r-00020B-H9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:31:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A333E0A60; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 17:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFFDE09F7 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 17:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so1942248gwb.40 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nPJPoBxme+K6/eC/kSuK0wEBU9wEvnA6mm4qok67i+I=; b=N1tjU2FoJJOkWMB/l0hlLxbUxqToFNrJP/R3qWhmqbhWvAD+pWdFKaxnb9zBnUD1OM H7tgjEQqPk2eF7YC4vWUmoqLn0bKaZOfJQn1o2Q3D43P3lstLbqg2VwEveLDt0eCsZWE h0iak79QkIjl/WdR7fRhsnQ/edFTL/jgItSrA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=MZsxm08KU+3oy8NnZ2N+e6r5P8aGzjyTmKV9pLsVn7wy2l24dXCNoQ8wqp3PpzLCHy +UVF5ldyzLBSGCpk6sCocA8s1ilDAe4ETC99xYNniMW8KOXPlT3QZZV8p1r+luz0JR5N Ad/P7HADALEkY+JN5SRUoGSQ0wnD91LSZUMPI= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.5.18 with SMTP id h18mr1137114ani.120.1278091834856; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.10.11 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C2E0AC5.5000302@gentoo.org> References: <1276977363.2635.0@NeddySeagoon> <4C1F9460.2020803@gentoo.org> <4C1FDB72.3020609@gentoo.org> <4C2A9394.3060307@gentoo.org> <4C2E0AC5.5000302@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 23:00:34 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BQ1q4ccHE_riYAdVUthO0YlOjbw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council manifesto of sping From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 87fe6cdf-7d06-4f6b-8dab-9e508fa2204e X-Archives-Hash: f33b210864932237c497854362ffd0bf On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > I think we're mixing up a few things by now: > - What cases should be handled in public, which shouldn't > - Does DevRel work effectively or not > - The special case of banning people > > All I want to say right here is that: > - Not everything needs to be handle loudly and public > =C2=A0(if I made that impression) > - I do believe in need for fundamental changes on DevRel > =C2=A0(as introduced in a another thread earlier) > > For the rest I propose to take this offline. > I am interested in your viewpoint on the rest as well. If you do continue this discussion offline, I'd like the results of that to be reflected in a public way (as v2 of your manifesto perhaps?) so that me, as well as others who are interested in your view points as a council nominee are kept up-to-date on them. Thanks! --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team