From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2ukA-00063V-8S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:19:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF2F61C13F; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34B31C11A for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so642228iyb.40 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Bhwi+ZEA17LOzc70E5IsGZKZH++uxo855Dr8c5lf5LI=; b=h+rFFHjl2CYg8XDxtOCnPCpr/YAi8IAVPlZWxwmMNGCUpUYlnzc6KiUTN4JS0NGumg Nt9KsfKkguQIB15DPHmNI1uu6TH7npkr1Q9NGZUrQXnclZ4tR+qrcrpgcj6idC8OzdWP 5lzjZWpSdfr6GxKrSxJ1v6Rswu2iHYjfbVAeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=rlWBLbQ1KgHFCHKPPRx81XiHChJhqGjLkGVqOSqjzgzG2hhA24KkmW9/ZOBoKvkgjG 8Wl9VVbisaMkmxy0v0qC1SAQlnM+RAcau60XSyYBVwBCjTMT28WaSdmeWgfM9/5MU9Z6 aFtlxD4s1imhT/DzzC7H93KQn4KCTa0aEa5Qc= Received: by 10.231.130.22 with SMTP id q22mr124756ibs.97.1301012313087; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:18:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110325000931.GA21942@lemongrass.antoszka.pl> References: <20110325005026.55598579@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20110325000931.GA21942@lemongrass.antoszka.pl> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:18:13 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YwYhAsYLgG4dWStxZ51ddI7B_8E Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bc0295ae98a3c9b73c40b5f3efd4ef7e On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50): >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned >> > Manifest's anymore ? >> >> Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO >> for a couple of years. :) > > Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally > approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of problems)? yes -mike