From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44916-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Q2PjF-00071n-Oz
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:12:10 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EA2E1C090;
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:11:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF0EE05DB
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:11:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so9945217fxm.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=vuHrMOphImu5MFOEAIJyThV5NyqDyGIovGByWNUXbEQ=;
b=qIL+6MkqWb3YQew4tHl6IDf3fXvx+uXR//nYb9a+OSCcbZcwilLVwjz6K36w/l+RF1
LTWVhpvJOXpq1kX/uL/BEI56Y1tKxVsfwbpDgxhuVvaApfX2Qiy66QjnHSXvNJaMFBIA
WOB5ub6NT+tYmpTdnORUHuuDrzx8PARRoaaCM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
b=pVoAXJtQlEWHa0FnRm7cdjw49sF8gwYX8v6f2hMX1c0Xm6QcSHS7nLsuCCkKTO8Zd4
MuIvv68uYejK0cs4RyFOk/G1VbSnWBvZdXM8vjBRfpUVygq7WMciisURCEPqs0M8ID4r
mUzg4WLCvMxMVJsQouUZCee0EjUpD+RKK7chI=
Received: by 10.223.15.141 with SMTP id k13mr3196152faa.30.1300893076062; Wed,
23 Mar 2011 08:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.5.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <509b5f5e24de3a32cb171d536b2f7fa8@webmail.jolexa.net>
References: <4D89FEC1.1030905@gentoo.org> <509b5f5e24de3a32cb171d536b2f7fa8@webmail.jolexa.net>
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:10:35 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9s_v9A_Uw1W2Di8ucfIShLFosic
Message-ID: <AANLkTikBBgjVUTqifUmjz+MYmPDaAWBWj+VUOkkmsvqF@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: fd89fd93260eb29fb0cc790a35b9e8ca
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> When reading about the "fork" awhile back, I assumed that ffmpeg would die
> and libav would continue in its place. Do we really need a virtual for
> this??
might as well hedge our bets. it'd really suck if we threw all our
eggs into libav just to have to crash, or for it to move back to
ffmpeg.
-mike