From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3kiX-0003Dp-D7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:48:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 627321C0B8; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E851C0B2 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so2587437wwj.10 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:48:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aliKsKnOKDumuXwLetUPNxWCn0qfj1oPD7N/9GQQVQ0=; b=e6nuU3DRr1cNmtxHszPzOExGTJaDnSwVOgGoUsumPX0F53Wah1m+Zqobt5Yox/9PmT MgsrbmaZg+yEEucvXaww7RnKEsFd7bJYYPL+FI9hKi5UooNBAgTT1YLu+gOP2xcbfxMZ zfNmLOIbAl+RWPgWdd2QSqvWrwwvevQWXA3BM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FBL9vAcPrr01OcqsX74RzN4UDS+Uksf2dvdT9gOfbvejXAP09kuvzV6ENdMBbBKZBR tcvXB9Q3NI4kAZ8PTx314OMgdMI9Tg/fTIEIIzDeyb1TUGEOBht44MFA2whyW7e7LTez tyPCalkem22usouJKmvsnhqNl1qAIa97DKOHw= Received: by 10.216.143.135 with SMTP id l7mr1531142wej.86.1301212086222; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.93.197 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:47:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D8EC104.4090503@gentoo.org> References: <20110326055210.E906D20054@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4D8EC104.4090503@gentoo.org> From: Nirbheek Chauhan Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:17:46 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ByyHCQGLx322oNQziKZ6W5lx688 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Jeremy Olexa , Mike Frysinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 398d5d256d1e956a3f8bad57a7ff229d On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On 03/26/2011 12:52 AM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: > >> Index: metadata.xml >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> >> >> no-herd >> >> =C2=A0 maintainer-needed@gentoo.org >> >> > > Can this practice of adding m-n packages to gentoo-x86 be stopped? If you > add it, take responsibility for it, please. If you don't want to take > responsibility for it, at least find a team that is willing to look after > it. > If you prohibit people from doing that, they'll just commit it normally, and then remove themselves a week later. I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for removal) all maintainer-needed packages from the tree by doing that one month after they become maintainer-needed. If someone doesn't volunteer to take care of it, it probably wasn't important anyway. --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team