From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:33:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik8TchYYuPP946ByKa86aPk_fWkFOSryK_aF_MN@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C211A40.6070001@gentoo.org>
On 23 June 2010 01:47, Mike Auty <ikelos@gentoo.org> wrote:
[...]
>> Which should not be an issue since any library that has some sort of
>> introspection can use this flag (and the use.desc can be changed
>> appropriately at that time if it does not use gobject-introspection).
>
> Why have to change it in the future (and probably split it into two
> flags then), when the choice hasn't been made yet? Or, to put your own
> question to you, why are you vehemently for "introspection" when others
> have shown concern with the choice? As far as I can see, the only
> difference is requiring a slightly longer use_enable line.
Mostly because I don't want to coin a new term if it's not absolutely necessary.
That said, you're right - more people seem to be comfortable with
"gintrospection" than plain "introspection". If no further objections
arise, we'll go with "gintrospection".
Thanks,
--
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-20 14:42 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection Arun Raghavan
2010-06-20 19:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Pacho Ramos
2010-06-20 21:35 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-20 21:53 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-06-20 20:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Olivier Crête
2010-06-20 21:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-20 22:55 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-20 23:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-21 4:43 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 7:10 ` Michał Górny
2010-06-21 4:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 6:13 ` Alexis Ballier
2010-06-21 6:53 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 7:03 ` Alexis Ballier
2010-06-21 7:04 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-06-21 9:07 ` Duncan
2010-06-21 13:46 ` Olivier Crête
2010-06-21 14:49 ` Duncan
2010-06-21 13:55 ` René 'Necoro' Neumann
2010-06-21 7:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Maciej Mrozowski
2010-06-21 14:22 ` Olivier Crête
2010-06-21 15:44 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-06-21 15:53 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 9:47 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 11:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-06-22 14:33 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 16:33 ` Mike Auty
2010-06-22 17:11 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 20:17 ` Mike Auty
2010-06-23 4:03 ` Arun Raghavan [this message]
2010-06-25 14:56 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-06-22 18:00 ` Jacob Godserv
2010-06-21 14:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-22 17:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arun Raghavan
2010-07-23 13:14 ` Maciej Mrozowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTik8TchYYuPP946ByKa86aPk_fWkFOSryK_aF_MN@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ford_prefect@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox