From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OGedP-0003Nj-UU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 20:52:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6259AE0997; Mon, 24 May 2010 20:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603BAE0102 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 20:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so2632201fxm.40 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:51:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IrsSnPOvUBZ7gPchdwy4QrYX78aGo/nxMb/2+u+Eu/0=; b=iIuHQcRH1vpq3OYjlfRG1qdHI09IPLdjziASt+J29BEQJZ/HwJ4SCYnzFPW5R1qoXQ BrTL4X0KmiLHBB0prAM5zaWHQm3Nz0Ih9oFh8o2Akd3pqhJwdcH5yAuTbop4TB6xT8XJ A34hl6EsreG1lYne4ZvtA1NovChBIE99ucgTI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=l+kXwBK320Waz6/oGCzbkMg39iYl3J0/ABYIHyAnAn5PxpKYbyYgPRShFqSE2kjaGc r36nZUoOB7SRdVVTeHHdmyGZW0WozOLwm8u7SMMg3LJo36Jk/QOGRIv8bvamwiUtIb+a 198RxBNMBxWF4171KhctqYqn2tqaOpYFI9G8Y= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.198.39 with SMTP id v39mr4903265muf.129.1274734298339; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.233.7 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:51:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFA3C7D.2040605@gentoo.org> References: <201005231854.31921.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BFA3C7D.2040605@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:51:38 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: D27HotpnpbEtR_9JDSJ07toBMVU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass eautomake update From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 0d25c5b5-f537-498a-8cba-1148832ad3eb X-Archives-Hash: 258b39ba141e42a0e1dff173b1117e80 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. =A0hopef= ully >> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who kno= ws. >> >> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake failure, try backing out the >> autotools.eclass change first. > > I think any autotools.eclass behavior changes would benefit from being > sent to gentoo-dev for review first. if i felt most people had an understanding of how autotools worked let alone how autotools.eclass, then perhaps i would -mike