public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:44:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6BBvKKR8iGQvTc4XAoKCmEh=gwf6RUgaemiKt@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikxAMHSBuxPTeDv0XOr9P_fiKhtOnAad6CWNzeV@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It's really simple:
>
> (a) If the package has plenty of users, there should be no problems
> finding a maintainer or a proxy-maintainer.

Uh, I guess that's why we are flooded with people wanting to be
devs...  There are lots of high-use packages that could use more
maintainers.  I'm not aware of any teams that would turn away help.

> (b) If the package has few users and is high-maintenance, it's either
> already broken, or will get broken soon without a maintainer. Find one
> or remove it!

If it doesn't build, then it can be removed.  Nobody is arguing with
that.  If you think that someday it might not build, then just wait a
few months and if you're right you can satisfy your itch to prune the
tree...

> (c) If the package has few users and is low-maintenance, package.mask
> it so we can figure out who the users are, and we can get them to
> proxy-maintain it, it's so little work anyway, right?

Uh, package.mask is not intended to be an end-user communication tool.
 News is slightly better in this respect, but again this is not its
purpose.

We shouldn't be punishing people for not becoming developers.  I don't
want to use a distro that throws up warning messages every few months
because some package I've been using had its developer retire, and I'm
a developer.  If it breaks and I care enough about it, I'll rescue it.
 If I'm passionate about it, I'll step in before it breaks.  Holding
users ransom is not the solution.

> (d) If the package has very few or no users, what the hell is it doing
> unmaintained in the tree? It's just eating up disk inodes and space.
>

Uh, and how much does the inodes, space, and bandwidth consumed by
those ~700 m-n packages actually cost.  Are we talking about going
through wailing and gnashing of teeth so that our stakeholders can
save a total of 45 cents worth of disk space across 50 mirrors and
50,000 Gentoo boxes over the next 5 years?  If one person is getting
use out of it, and nobody is getting hurt, and it costs a few inodes,
I'm fine with that.

> We all like to boast about how gentoo has 15,000 packages, but we
> neglect to mention that more than 1000 of these are either
> unmaintained or very poorly maintained. And this is a very
> conservative number.

I don't know anybody who uses Gentoo because of our huge repository.
Sure, compared to LFS it is big.  Compared to most major distros,
Gentoo isn't all that large.  If all somebody wants is a ton of
packages they're going to run Debian or whatever.  Sure, we have a
nice repository and we should be proud of it, but I don't think
anybody is trying to over-inflate our repo size just by loading it up
with junk.

The thing I don't understand here is that there seems to be some
perception that having stuff in the tree or in Bugzilla costs us
something.  Sure, at some level it does, and if 99.99% of portage were
junk data, then we might have a problem.  However, database records
and inodes come billions for the dollar.  Having a few percent more
churn so that we can more gracefully handle the lifecycle of packages
doesn't seem like much of a sacrifice.  If you're tired of looking at
junk when you search bugzilla, then you need to think about how you're
searching it.  These sorts of arguments come up at work all the time
and unless there is some kind of regulatory issue at stake or real
loss of revenue associated with lost opportunities, chasing down
unnecessary database records to be "tidy" almost always costs far more
than it saves.

I'd be shocked if the total cost to our sponsors in mirror space for
m-n packages exceeded the value of time spent by everybody reading
this thread.  I think we should be practical - I'm all for giving
treecleaners a free hand when packages really cause problems, but
being anal-retentive just for the sake of doing so doesn't seem to
create real value.

Rich



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-27 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110326055210.E906D20054@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
2011-03-27  4:45 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml Jeremy Olexa
2011-03-27  7:47   ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 10:29     ` Markos Chandras
2011-03-27  9:39       ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 13:04         ` Treeclean all maintainer-needed packages, was: " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-03-27 15:37         ` Ryan Hill
2011-03-27 13:30     ` Jeremy Olexa
2011-03-27 13:43       ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 19:17         ` Alec Warner
2011-03-27 19:40           ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 20:17             ` Alec Warner
2011-03-27 21:25               ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 23:34                 ` Ryan Hill
2011-03-28  1:59                   ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-03-27 20:44             ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2011-03-27 21:09               ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-28  1:58                 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-03-27 21:28               ` René 'Necoro' Neumann
2011-04-05  4:26                 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-05 10:58                   ` Alec Warner
2011-04-05 15:08                     ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-18 17:56                   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-03-27 13:44       ` Rich Freeman
2011-03-27 14:54         ` Tomáš Chvátal
2011-03-27 16:18           ` Rich Freeman
2011-03-27 14:08       ` Maintainership offering; was: " René 'Necoro' Neumann
2011-03-27 19:05         ` Jeremy Olexa
2011-03-27 20:20       ` Proxy maintainership of app-misc/pwsafe, was " Christopher Head
2011-03-27 20:47         ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-27 20:55           ` René 'Necoro' Neumann
2011-03-27 20:55           ` David Abbott
2011-03-27 21:32             ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-03-29 17:50       ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-03-29 13:33     ` Jeroen Roovers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTik6BBvKKR8iGQvTc4XAoKCmEh=gwf6RUgaemiKt@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=nirbheek@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox